Oral versus Intravenous Opioid Dosing for the Initial Treatment of Acute Musculoskeletal Pain in the Emergency Department

被引:23
|
作者
Miner, James R. [1 ]
Moore, Johanna [1 ]
Gray, Richard O. [1 ]
Skinner, Lisa [1 ]
Biros, Michelle H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hennepin Cty Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Minneapolis, MN 55415 USA
关键词
pain; treatment; oxycodone; morphine; emergency department; emergency medicine;
D O I
10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00266.x
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The objective was to compare the time to medication administration, the side effects, and the analgesic effect at sequential time points after medication administration of an oral treatment strategy using oxycodone solution with an intravenous (IV) treatment strategy using morphine sulfate for the initial treatment of musculoskeletal pain in emergency department (ED) patients. This was a prospective randomized clinical trial of patients > 6 years old who were going to receive IV morphine sulfate for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain but did not yet have an IV. Consenting patients were randomized to have the treating physician order either 0.1 mg/kg morphine sulfate IV or 0.125 mg/kg oxycodone orally in a 5 mg/5 mL suspension as their initial treatment for pain. The time from the placement of the order to the administration of the medication was recorded. Pain was measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) and recorded at 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 minutes after drug administration. A total of 405 eligible patients were identified during the study period; 328 (81.0%) patients consented to be in the study. A total of 158 patients were randomized to the IV morphine sulfate treatment group, and 162 were randomized to the oral oxycodone treatment group. Of the patients who were randomized to IV therapy, 34 were withdrawn from the study prior to drug administration; leaving 125 patients in the IV group for analysis. Of the patients who randomized to oral therapy, 22 were withdrawn from the study prior to drug administration, leaving 140 patients for analysis. No serious adverse events were detected. There was a 12-minute difference between the median time of the order and the administration of oral oxycodone (8.5 minutes) and IV morphine (20.5 minutes). The mean percent change in VAS score was larger for patients in the IV therapy group than those in the oral therapy group at 10 and 20 minutes. At 30 and 40 minutes, the authors could no longer detect a difference. The satisfaction scale score was higher after treatment for the morphine group (median = 4; interquartile range [IQR] = 4 to 5) than for the oxycodone group (median = 4; IQR = 2 to 5; p = 0.008). The oral loading strategy was associated with delayed onset of analgesia and decreased patient satisfaction, but a shorter time to administration. The oral loading strategy using an oxycodone solution provided similar pain relief to the IV strategy using morphine 30 minutes after administration of the drug. Oral 0.125 mg/kg oxycodone represents a feasible alternative to 0.1 mg/kg IV morphine in the treatment of severe acute musculoskeletal pain when difficult or delayed IV placement greater than 30 minutes presents a barrier to treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:1234 / 1240
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Disparities in the initial assessment of acute chest pain in the emergency department
    Bowker, Harold
    Selzman, Kimberly A.
    Rabinovich, Sergio, Jr.
    Cohen, Mauricio
    Mehrotra, Abhishek
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 51 (10) : A246 - A246
  • [32] INTRAMUSCULAR KETOROLAC VERSUS ORAL IBUPROFEN IN ACUTE MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN
    TURTURRO, MA
    PARIS, PM
    SEABERG, DC
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1995, 26 (02) : 117 - 120
  • [33] Oral versus intravenous antibiotics for the initial treatment of acute pyelonephritis in adults: a systematic review
    Enlow, William
    Fortier-Dumais, Frederique
    Tardif, Pier-Alexandre
    Blanchard, Pierre-Gilles
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2024, 22
  • [34] A randomized trial of intramuscular olanzapine versus oral clonidine for symptomatic treatment of opioid withdrawal in the emergency department
    Klein, Lauren
    Cole, Jon
    Driver, Brian
    Martel, Marc
    CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2017, 55 (07) : 692 - 693
  • [35] Oral or intravenous thiamine in the emergency department
    Jackson, R
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2004, 21 (04) : 501 - 502
  • [36] Opioid prescription practices for patients discharged from the emergency department with acute musculoskeletal fractures
    Mok, Garrick
    Newton, Hailey
    Thurgur, Lisa
    Nemnom, Marie-Joe
    Stiell, Ian G.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 22 (04) : 486 - 493
  • [37] Opioid use for acute headache treatment in a Brazilian Emergency Department
    Taricani Kubota, G.
    Nattan Portes Souza, M.
    Calderaro, M.
    de Sousa Oliveira, A. P.
    Kuster, G.
    Rodrigues Jordao, M.
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2021, 22 (SUPPL 1): : 40 - 40
  • [38] Opioid use for acute headache treatment in a Brazilian Emergency Department
    Taricani Kubota, G.
    Nattan Portes Souza, M.
    Calderaro, M.
    De Sousa Oliveira, A. P.
    Kuster, G.
    Rodrigues Jordao, M.
    CEPHALALGIA, 2021, 41 (1_SUPPL) : 60 - 61
  • [39] Comparative Effectiveness of Ketorolac Dosing Strategies for Emergency Department Patients With Acute Pain
    Forestell, Ben
    Sabbineni, Monica
    Sharif, Sameer
    Chao, Jennifer
    Eltorki, Mohamed
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2023, 82 (05) : 615 - 623
  • [40] Return Rates for Opioid Versus Non-Opioid Management of Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department
    Ginsberg, Z.
    Lindor, R.
    Campbell, R.
    Ghaith, S.
    Buckner-Petty, S.
    McElhinny, M.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 80 (04) : S127 - S127