Oral versus Intravenous Opioid Dosing for the Initial Treatment of Acute Musculoskeletal Pain in the Emergency Department

被引:23
|
作者
Miner, James R. [1 ]
Moore, Johanna [1 ]
Gray, Richard O. [1 ]
Skinner, Lisa [1 ]
Biros, Michelle H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hennepin Cty Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Minneapolis, MN 55415 USA
关键词
pain; treatment; oxycodone; morphine; emergency department; emergency medicine;
D O I
10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00266.x
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The objective was to compare the time to medication administration, the side effects, and the analgesic effect at sequential time points after medication administration of an oral treatment strategy using oxycodone solution with an intravenous (IV) treatment strategy using morphine sulfate for the initial treatment of musculoskeletal pain in emergency department (ED) patients. This was a prospective randomized clinical trial of patients > 6 years old who were going to receive IV morphine sulfate for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain but did not yet have an IV. Consenting patients were randomized to have the treating physician order either 0.1 mg/kg morphine sulfate IV or 0.125 mg/kg oxycodone orally in a 5 mg/5 mL suspension as their initial treatment for pain. The time from the placement of the order to the administration of the medication was recorded. Pain was measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) and recorded at 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 minutes after drug administration. A total of 405 eligible patients were identified during the study period; 328 (81.0%) patients consented to be in the study. A total of 158 patients were randomized to the IV morphine sulfate treatment group, and 162 were randomized to the oral oxycodone treatment group. Of the patients who were randomized to IV therapy, 34 were withdrawn from the study prior to drug administration; leaving 125 patients in the IV group for analysis. Of the patients who randomized to oral therapy, 22 were withdrawn from the study prior to drug administration, leaving 140 patients for analysis. No serious adverse events were detected. There was a 12-minute difference between the median time of the order and the administration of oral oxycodone (8.5 minutes) and IV morphine (20.5 minutes). The mean percent change in VAS score was larger for patients in the IV therapy group than those in the oral therapy group at 10 and 20 minutes. At 30 and 40 minutes, the authors could no longer detect a difference. The satisfaction scale score was higher after treatment for the morphine group (median = 4; interquartile range [IQR] = 4 to 5) than for the oxycodone group (median = 4; IQR = 2 to 5; p = 0.008). The oral loading strategy was associated with delayed onset of analgesia and decreased patient satisfaction, but a shorter time to administration. The oral loading strategy using an oxycodone solution provided similar pain relief to the IV strategy using morphine 30 minutes after administration of the drug. Oral 0.125 mg/kg oxycodone represents a feasible alternative to 0.1 mg/kg IV morphine in the treatment of severe acute musculoskeletal pain when difficult or delayed IV placement greater than 30 minutes presents a barrier to treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:1234 / 1240
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Disparities in analgesia and opioid prescribing practices for patients with musculoskeletal pain in the emergency department
    Heins, Janet Kaye
    Heins, Alan
    Grammas, Marianthe
    Costello, Melissa
    Huang, Kun
    Mishra, Satya
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY NURSING, 2006, 32 (03) : 219 - 224
  • [22] Comment: Aggressive Versus Conservative Initial Diuretic Dosing in the Emergency Department for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
    Koratala, Abhilash
    Kazory, Amir
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2018, 52 (03) : 300 - 300
  • [23] Intravenous dexketoprofen versus paracetamol in non-traumatic musculoskeletal pain in the emergency department: A randomized clinical trial
    Demirozogul, Ezgi
    Yilmaz, Atakan
    Ozen, Mert
    Turkcuer, Ibrahim
    Seyit, Murat
    Arikan, Cuneyt
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 37 (12): : 2136 - 2142
  • [24] Opioid vs Nonopioid Acute Pain Management in the Emergency Department
    Kyriacou, Demetrios N.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 318 (17): : 1655 - 1656
  • [25] INTRANASAL SUFENTANIL VERSUS INTRAVENOUS MORPHINE FOR ACUTE PAIN IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT: A RANDOMIZED PILOT TRIAL
    Sin, Billy
    Jeffrey, Iain
    Halpern, Zachary
    Adebayo, Adebanke
    Wing, Tom
    Lee, Amy S.
    Ruiz, Josel
    Persaud, Kevin
    Davenport, Lilia
    de Souza, Sylvie
    Williams, Mollie
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 56 (03): : 301 - 307
  • [26] Opioid and non-opioid pain relief after an emergency department acute pain visit
    Raoul Daoust
    Jean Paquet
    Alexis Cournoyer
    Éric Piette
    Judy Morris
    Justine Lessard
    Véronique Castonguay
    Gilles Lavigne
    Vérilibe Huard
    Jean-Marc Chauny
    Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2021, 23 : 342 - 350
  • [27] Opioid and non-opioid pain relief after an emergency department acute pain visit
    Daoust, Raoul
    Paquet, Jean
    Cournoyer, Alexis
    Piette, Eric
    Morris, Judy
    Lessard, Justine
    Castonguay, Veronique
    Lavigne, Gilles
    Huard, Verilibe
    Chauny, Jean-Marc
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 23 (03) : 342 - 350
  • [28] Treating musculoskeletal pain in the emergency department
    Casal Codesido, Jose Ramon
    Vazquez Lima, Manuel Jose
    EMERGENCIAS, 2012, 24 (01): : 59 - 65
  • [29] Comparing two doses of intramuscular ketorolac for treatment of acute musculoskeletal pain in a military emergency department
    Turner, Nathaniel J.
    Long, Drew A.
    Bongiorno, Joseph R.
    Katoski, Timothy P.
    Jin, Lisa M.
    Horsch, John Paul
    Ahern, Brian J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 50 : 142 - 147
  • [30] Ketamine Versus Opioids for Acute Pain in the Emergency Department
    Duhaime, Michael J.
    Wolfson, Allan B.
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 27 (08) : 781 - 782