Oral versus Intravenous Opioid Dosing for the Initial Treatment of Acute Musculoskeletal Pain in the Emergency Department

被引:23
|
作者
Miner, James R. [1 ]
Moore, Johanna [1 ]
Gray, Richard O. [1 ]
Skinner, Lisa [1 ]
Biros, Michelle H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hennepin Cty Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Minneapolis, MN 55415 USA
关键词
pain; treatment; oxycodone; morphine; emergency department; emergency medicine;
D O I
10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00266.x
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The objective was to compare the time to medication administration, the side effects, and the analgesic effect at sequential time points after medication administration of an oral treatment strategy using oxycodone solution with an intravenous (IV) treatment strategy using morphine sulfate for the initial treatment of musculoskeletal pain in emergency department (ED) patients. This was a prospective randomized clinical trial of patients > 6 years old who were going to receive IV morphine sulfate for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain but did not yet have an IV. Consenting patients were randomized to have the treating physician order either 0.1 mg/kg morphine sulfate IV or 0.125 mg/kg oxycodone orally in a 5 mg/5 mL suspension as their initial treatment for pain. The time from the placement of the order to the administration of the medication was recorded. Pain was measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) and recorded at 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 minutes after drug administration. A total of 405 eligible patients were identified during the study period; 328 (81.0%) patients consented to be in the study. A total of 158 patients were randomized to the IV morphine sulfate treatment group, and 162 were randomized to the oral oxycodone treatment group. Of the patients who were randomized to IV therapy, 34 were withdrawn from the study prior to drug administration; leaving 125 patients in the IV group for analysis. Of the patients who randomized to oral therapy, 22 were withdrawn from the study prior to drug administration, leaving 140 patients for analysis. No serious adverse events were detected. There was a 12-minute difference between the median time of the order and the administration of oral oxycodone (8.5 minutes) and IV morphine (20.5 minutes). The mean percent change in VAS score was larger for patients in the IV therapy group than those in the oral therapy group at 10 and 20 minutes. At 30 and 40 minutes, the authors could no longer detect a difference. The satisfaction scale score was higher after treatment for the morphine group (median = 4; interquartile range [IQR] = 4 to 5) than for the oxycodone group (median = 4; IQR = 2 to 5; p = 0.008). The oral loading strategy was associated with delayed onset of analgesia and decreased patient satisfaction, but a shorter time to administration. The oral loading strategy using an oxycodone solution provided similar pain relief to the IV strategy using morphine 30 minutes after administration of the drug. Oral 0.125 mg/kg oxycodone represents a feasible alternative to 0.1 mg/kg IV morphine in the treatment of severe acute musculoskeletal pain when difficult or delayed IV placement greater than 30 minutes presents a barrier to treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:1234 / 1240
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Initial opioid dosing in the emergency department for acute pain
    Faley, Brian
    Procopio, Gabrielle
    Priano, James
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2015, 35 (11): : E218 - E218
  • [2] Oral oxycodone versus intravenous morphine in pediatric patients for the treatment of pain due to acute musculoskeletal injury in the emergency department
    Miner, J. R.
    Moore, J. C.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 48 (04) : S121 - S121
  • [3] Oral Aspirin/ketamine versus oral ketamine for emergency department patients with acute musculoskeletal pain
    Gerges, Louis
    Fassassi, Catsim
    Barberan, Carla
    Bravo, Sophia Correa
    Davis, Ashley
    Drapkin, Jefferson
    Likourezos, Antonios
    Silver, Michael
    Hossain, Rukhsana
    Niceforo, Patrizia
    Gohel, Ankit
    Motov, Sergey
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 58 : 298 - 304
  • [4] Intravenous lidocaine for the treatment of acute pain in the emergency department
    Fitzpatrick, Brendan Michael
    Mullins, Michael Eugene
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 3 (02): : 105 - 108
  • [5] Oral VTS-Aspirin/Ketamine Versus Oral Ketamine for Emergency Department Patients With Acute Musculoskeletal Pain
    Gerges, L.
    Fassassi, C.
    Masoudi, A.
    Correa-Bravo, S.
    Drapkin, J.
    Likourezos, A.
    Hossain, R.
    Butt, M.
    Silver, M.
    Motov, S.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 80 (04) : S130 - S131
  • [6] Intravenous Lidocaine versus Intravenous Ketorolac for the Emergency Department Treatment of Acute Radicular Low Back Pain
    Tanen, D. A.
    Danish, D. C.
    Shimada, M.
    Dos Santos, F.
    Maketa, M.
    Riffenburgh, R. H.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 58 (04) : S227 - S227
  • [7] Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravenous Acetaminophen Versus Intravenous Hydromorphone for the Treatment of Acute Pain in the Emergency Department
    Barnaby, Douglas P.
    Chertoff, Andrew E.
    Restivo, Andrew J.
    Campbell, Caron M.
    Pearlman, Scott
    White, Deborah
    Bijur, Polly E.
    Gallagher, E. John
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 73 (02) : 133 - 140
  • [8] Use of Intravenous Lidocaine for the Treatment of Acute Pain in the Emergency Department
    Wiafe, Jennifer
    Sin, Billy
    Kramer, Adam
    Yakobi, Ramy
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2017, 51 (10) : 923 - 923
  • [9] Assessment of intravenous insulin dosing strategies for the treatment of acute hyperkalemia in the emergency department
    Keeney, Katherine P.
    Calhoun, Chara
    Jennings, Lindsey
    Weeda, Erin R.
    Weant, Kyle A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 38 (06): : 1082 - 1085
  • [10] Nurse-initiated oral opioid pain protocol improves the quality of musculoskeletal pain management in the emergency department
    Caspi, Sigalit
    Meidan, Ronit
    Peless, Elad
    Raizman, Ela
    INTERNATIONAL EMERGENCY NURSING, 2019, 43 : 29 - 33