Patient variables impact lumbar spine dual energy X-ray absorptiometry precision

被引:21
作者
Blank, RD [1 ]
Malone, DG
Christian, RC
Vallarta-Ast, NL
Krueger, DC
Drezner, MK
Binkley, NC
Hansen, KE
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Osteoporosis Clin Ctr, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Res Program, Madison, WI USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Med, Endocrinol Diabet & Metab Sect, Madison, WI USA
[4] William S Middleton Vet Hosp, Madison, WI USA
[5] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Med, Rheumatol Sect, Madison, WI USA
[6] William S Middleton Vet Hosp, Dept Radiol, Madison, WI USA
[7] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Med, Geriatr Sect, Madison, WI USA
关键词
aging; epidemiology; evidence/guidelines; osteoporosis; precision; quantitation;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-005-0050-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Changes in bone mineral density are used to monitor osteoporosis therapy. To determine whether a change in bone mass is clinically significant, the precision of bone mineral density measurements must be known. Methods: We therefore measured the impact of vertebral body exclusion on dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) precision. At one university and one Veterans Affairs DXA center, three radiology technologists each scanned 30 participants twice, with repositioning between scans, to estimate DXA precision. Three International Society for Clinical Densitometry-certified physicians reviewed all lumbar spinal scans to note the presence of focal structural defects. We calculated precision for subsets of vertebrae, and for virtual samples of patients with and without physician-identified vertebral focal structural defects. We graphed the reciprocal of least significant change versus bone area to determine the dependence of precision on interpreted scan area. Results: Within each sample, greater interpretable bone area improved precision. The contribution of interpreted bone area to precision differed among the samples, ranging from 57 to 94%. Greater population bone mineral density heterogeneity and presence of focal structural defects each decreased precision. Conclusion: All bone densitometry centers must determine precision using a sample representative of their served populations. Failure to do so may lead to incorrect determination of least significant change. Population heterogeneity, vertebral body exclusion and presence of focal structural defects each decreases precision.
引用
收藏
页码:768 / 774
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Technical principles of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry
    Blake, GM
    Fogelman, I
    [J]. SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1997, 27 (03) : 210 - 228
  • [2] BONNICK SL, 1998, BONE DENSITOMETRY CL, P83
  • [3] Factors associated with the lumbar spine and proximal femur bone mineral density in older men
    Cauley, JA
    Fullman, RL
    Stone, KL
    Zmuda, JM
    Bauer, DC
    Barrett-Connor, E
    Ensrud, K
    Lau, EMC
    Orwoll, ES
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 16 (12) : 1525 - 1537
  • [4] FACTORS INFLUENCING SHORT-TERM PRECISION OF DUAL X-RAY BONE ABSORPTIOMETRY (DXA) OF SPINE AND FEMUR
    ENGELKE, K
    GLUER, CC
    GENANT, HK
    [J]. CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 56 (01) : 19 - 25
  • [5] Genant HK, 1996, J BONE MINER RES, V11, P707
  • [6] ACCURATE ASSESSMENT OF PRECISION ERRORS - HOW TO MEASURE THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF BONE DENSITOMETRY TECHNIQUES
    GLUER, CC
    BLAKE, G
    LU, Y
    BLUNT, BA
    JERGAS, M
    GENANT, HK
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 5 (04) : 262 - 270
  • [7] Hamdy Ronald C, 2002, J Clin Densitom, V5 Suppl, pS11, DOI 10.1385/JCD:5:3S:S11
  • [8] Use of the lowest vertebral body T-score to diagnose lumbar osteoporosis in men - Is "cherry picking" appropriate?
    Hansen, KE
    Vallarta-Ast, N
    Krueger, D
    Gangnon, R
    Drezner, MK
    Binkley, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2004, 7 (04) : 376 - 381
  • [9] Interobserver reproducibility of criteria for vertebral body exclusion
    Hansen, KE
    Binkley, N
    Christian, R
    Vallarta-Ast, N
    Krueger, D
    Drezner, MK
    Blank, RD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2005, 20 (03) : 501 - 508
  • [10] JONES G, 1995, J RHEUMATOL, V22, P932