Usefulness of Q-Wave Area for Threshold-Based Stratification of Global Left Ventricular Myocardial Infarct Size

被引:17
作者
Kochav, Jonathan D. [1 ,2 ]
Okin, Peter M. [1 ]
Wilson, Sean [1 ]
Afroz, Anika [1 ]
Renilla, Alfredo [3 ]
Weinsaft, Jonathan W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Med, Greenberg Cardiol Div, New York, NY USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
[3] Hosp Univ Cent Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
关键词
CARDIAC MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; SELVESTER QRS SCORE; IRREVERSIBLE INJURY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; RISK; QUANTIFICATION; DEFIBRILLATORS; ENHANCEMENT; VALIDATION; SCAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.03.013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Left ventricular (LV) infarct size affects prognosis after acute myocardial infarction (AM!). Delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (DE-CMR) provides accurate infarct quantification but is unavailable or contraindicated in many patients. This study tested whether simple electrocardiography (ECG) parameters can stratify LV infarct size. One hundred fifty-two patients with AM! underwent DE-CMR and serial 12-lead ECG. Electrocardiograms were quantitatively analyzed for multiple aspects of Q-wave morphology, including duration, amplitude, and geometric area (QWAr) summed across all leads except aVR. Patients with pathologic Q waves had larger infarcts measured by DE-CMR or enzymes (both p <0.001), even after controlling for infarct distribution by CMR or x-ray angiography. Comparison between early (4 +/- 0.4 days after AMI) and follow-up (29 +/- 6 days) ECG demonstrated temporal reductions in Q-wave amplitude (1.8 +/- 1.4 vs 1.6 +/- 1.6 mV; p = 0.03) but not QWAr (41 +/- 38 vs 39 +/- 43 mV.ms; p = 0.29). At both times, QWAr augmented stepwise with DE-CMR quantified infarct size (p <0.001). QWAr increased markedly at 10% LV infarct threshold, with differences more than threefold on early ECG (59 +/- 39 vs 18 +/- 20 mV.ms; p <0.001) and nearly fivefold (59 +/- 46 vs 13 +/- 16 mV.ms; p <0.001) on follow-up. Diagnostic performance compared with a 10% infarction cutoff was good on early (area under the curve = 0.84) and follow-up (area under the curve = 0.87) ECG. Optimization of sensitivity (95% to 98%) enabled QWAr to exclude affected patients with 90% to 94% negative predictive value at each time point. In conclusion, LV infarct size is accompanied by stepwise increments in Q-wave morphology, with QWAr increased three-to fivefold at a threshold of 10% LV infarction. Stratification based on QWAr provides excellent negative predictive value for exclusion of large (>= 10%) LV infarct burden. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 180
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Accurate and objective infarct sizing by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in a canine myocardial infarction model [J].
Amado, LC ;
Gerber, BL ;
Gupta, SN ;
Szarf, G ;
Schock, R ;
Nasir, K ;
Kraitchman, DL ;
Lima, JAC .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 44 (12) :2383-2389
[2]   Effects of primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction on early and late infarct size and left ventricular wall characteristics [J].
Baks, T ;
van Geuns, RJ ;
Biagini, E ;
Wielopolski, P ;
Mollet, NR ;
Cademartiri, F ;
van der Giessen, WJ ;
Krestin, GP ;
Serruys, PW ;
Duncker, DJ ;
de Feyter, PJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (01) :40-44
[3]   Comparison of infarct size changes with delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and electrocardiogram QRS scoring during the 6 months after acutely reperfused myocardial infarction [J].
Bang, Lia E. ;
Ripa, Rasmus S. ;
Grande, Peer ;
Kastrup, Jens ;
Clemmensen, Peter M. ;
Wagner, Galen S. .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2008, 41 (06) :609-613
[4]   Comparison of Selvester QRS score with magnetic resonance imaging measured infarct size in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction [J].
Carlsen, Esben A. ;
Bang, Lia E. ;
Ahtarovski, Kiril A. ;
Engstrom, Thomas ;
Kober, Lars ;
Kelbaek, Henning ;
Vejlstrup, Niels ;
Jorgensen, Erik ;
Helqvist, Steffen ;
Saunamaki, Kari ;
Clemmensen, Peter ;
Holmvang, Lene ;
Wagner, Galen S. ;
Lonborg, Jacob .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2012, 45 (04) :414-419
[5]   Prognostic Significance of Delayed-Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging Survival of 857 Patients With and Without Left Ventricular Dysfunction [J].
Cheong, Benjamin Y. C. ;
Muthupillai, Raja ;
Wilson, James M. ;
Sung, Angela ;
Huber, Steffen ;
Amin, Samir ;
Elayda, MacArthur A. ;
Lee, Vei-Vei ;
Flamm, Scott D. .
CIRCULATION, 2009, 120 (21) :2069-2076
[6]   Mitral Apparatus Assessment by Delayed Enhancement CMR Relative Impact of Infarct Distribution on Mitral Regurgitation [J].
Chinitz, Jason S. ;
Chen, Debbie ;
Goyal, Parag ;
Wilson, Sean ;
Islam, Fahmida ;
Thanh Nguyen ;
Wang, Yi ;
Hurtado-Rua, Sandra ;
Simprini, Lauren ;
Cham, Matthew ;
Levine, Robert A. ;
Devereux, Richard B. ;
Weinsaft, Jonathan W. .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2013, 6 (02) :220-234
[7]  
Engblom Henrik, 2005, Am Heart J, V150, P920
[8]   Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at risk - Distinction between reversible and irreversible injury throughout infarct healing [J].
Fieno, DS ;
Kim, RJ ;
Chen, EL ;
Lomasney, JW ;
Klocke, FJ ;
Judd, RM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 36 (06) :1985-1991
[9]   Electrocardiographic Q-Wave "Remodeling" in Reperfused ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Validation Study With CMR [J].
Florian, Anca ;
Slavich, Massimo ;
Masci, Pier Giorgio ;
Janssens, Stefan ;
Bogaert, Jan .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2012, 5 (10) :1003-1013
[10]   Validation of three myocardial jeopardy scores in a population-based cardiac catheterization cohort [J].
Graham, MM ;
Faris, PD ;
Ghali, WA ;
Galbraith, PD ;
Norris, CM ;
Badry, JT ;
Mitchell, LB ;
Curtis, MJ ;
Knudtson, ML .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2001, 142 (02) :254-261