Numerical Experiments on Oxygen Plasma Focus: Scaling Laws of Soft X-Ray Yields

被引:1
|
作者
Akel, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Atom Energy Commiss, Dept Phys, Damascus, Syria
关键词
Plasma focus; Oxygen gas; Soft X-ray; Scaling Law; Lee model code; EMISSION;
D O I
10.1007/s10894-013-9595-z
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
Numerical experiments have been investigated on UNU/ICTP PFF low energy plasma focus device with oxygen filling gas. In these numerical experiments, the temperature window of 119-260 eV has been used as a suitable temperature range for generating oxygen soft X-rays. The Lee model was applied to characterize the UNU/ICTP PFF plasma focus. The optimum soft X-ray yield (Y-sxr) was found to be 0.75 J, with the corresponding efficiency of about 0.03 % at pressure of 2.36 Torr and the end axial speed was v(a) = 5 cm/mu s. The practical optimum combination of p(0), z(0) and 'a' for oxygen Y-sxr was found to be 0.69 Torr, 4.8 cm and 2.366 cm respectively, with the outer radius b = 3.2 cm. This combination gives Y-sxr similar to 5 J, with the corresponding efficiency of about 0.16 %. Thus we expect to increase the oxygen Y-sxr of UNU/ICTP PFF, without changing the capacitor bank, merely by changing the electrode configuration and operating pressure. Scaling laws on oxygen soft X-ray yield, in terms of storage energies E-0, peak discharge current I-peak and focus pinch current I-pinch were found over the range from 1 kJ to 1 MJ. It was found that the oxygen soft X-ray yields scale well with and for the low inductance (L-0 = 30 nH) (where yields are in J and currents in kA). While the soft X-ray yield scaling laws in terms of storage energies were found to be as (E-0 in kJ and Y-sxr in J) with the scaling showing gradual deterioration as E-0 rises over the range. The oxygen soft X-ray yield emitted from plasma focus is found to be about 8.7 kJ for storage energy of 1 MJ. The optimum efficiency for soft X-ray yield (1.1 %) is with capacitor bank energy of 120 kJ. This indicates that oxygen plasma focus is a good soft X-ray source when properly designed.
引用
收藏
页码:464 / 470
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Tailoring a plasma focus as hard x-ray source for imaging
    Hussain, S.
    Shafiq, M.
    Zakaullah, M.
    APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 2010, 96 (03)
  • [42] Optimizing UNU/ICTP PFF Plasma Focus for Neon Soft X-ray Operation
    Saw, Sor Heoh
    Lee, Paul Choon Keat
    Rawat, Rajdeep Singh
    Lee, Sing
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE, 2009, 37 (07) : 1276 - 1282
  • [43] Characterization of soft X-ray radiation from plasma focus device with gas puff
    Kitaoka, H
    Yamamoto, T
    Hirano, K
    JOURNAL OF THE PHYSICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 1998, 67 (02) : 481 - 486
  • [44] Effects of Electrode Geometric Parameters on Argon Soft X-Ray Radiation From Plasma Focus Machine: An Investigation by the Modified Lee Model
    Barati, Hadi
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE, 2023, 51 (12) : 3740 - 3745
  • [45] Neon Soft X-Ray Yield Optimization from PF-SY1 Plasma Focus Device
    Akel, M.
    Al-Hawat, Sh.
    Lee, S.
    JOURNAL OF FUSION ENERGY, 2011, 30 (01) : 39 - 47
  • [46] Compact laser produced plasma soft X-ray source for contact microscopy experiments
    Ayele, Mesfin G.
    Czwartos, Joanna
    Adjei, Daniel
    Wachulak, Przemyslaw
    Bartnik, Andrzej
    Wegrzynski, Lukasz
    Szczurek, Miroslaw
    Jarocki, Roman
    Fiedorowicz, Henryk
    DAMAGE TO VUV, EUV, AND X-RAY OPTICS V, 2015, 9511
  • [47] Practical Optimization of AECS PF-2 Plasma Focus Device for Argon Soft X-ray Operation
    Akel, M.
    Lee, S.
    JOURNAL OF FUSION ENERGY, 2012, 31 (02) : 122 - 129
  • [48] Electron Beam Properties Emitted From Deuterium Plasma Focus: Scaling Laws
    Akel, M.
    Saw, S. H.
    Lee, S.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE, 2017, 45 (08) : 2303 - 2307
  • [49] Neutron scaling laws from numerical experiments
    Lee, S.
    Saw, S. H.
    JOURNAL OF FUSION ENERGY, 2008, 27 (04) : 292 - 295
  • [50] Neutron Scaling Laws from Numerical Experiments
    S. Lee
    S. H. Saw
    Journal of Fusion Energy, 2008, 27 : 292 - 295