Bilateral cardiac catheterizations - The safety and feasibifity of a superficial forearm venous and transradial arterial approach

被引:15
作者
Yang, CH [1 ]
Guo, GBF [1 ]
Yip, HK [1 ]
Hsieh, K [1 ]
Fang, CY [1 ]
Chen, SM [1 ]
Cheng, CI [1 ]
Hang, CL [1 ]
Chen, MC [1 ]
Wu, CJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Div Cardiol, Dept Internal Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
关键词
cephalic vein; basilic vein; median antecubital vein; superficial forearm vein;
D O I
10.1536/ihj.47.21
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The transradial approach for left heart catheterization has become increasingly popular recently because of its clinical benefits. We examined the safety and feasibility of a transforearm approach for bilateral cardiac catheterizations, using the radial artery and a superficial forearm vein (the cephalic, basilic, or median antecubital vein). Between August 2002 and October 2003, 296 right heart catheterizations were performed in our hospital. A superficial forearm vein was used in one group of 101 patients, of which 98 had a concomitant left heart catheterization through the radial artery. The femoral vein was used for right heart catheterization in the second group of 195 patients. Of these patients, 37 underwent left heart catheterization through the radial artery and 157 through the femoral artery. All instances of bilateral catheterizations were successful except for one complication of pseudoaneurysm occurring in the transfemoral group. The procedure time for right heart catheterization was significantly less in the forearm group than the femoral group. The transforearm group had a larger proportion of males and of patients undergoing diagnostic right heart catheterization for congestive heart failure, dilated cardiomyopathy, and ischemic cardiomyopathy, Patients with aortic stenosis (AS), atrial septal defect (ASD), and mitral stenosis (MS) were mainly restricted to the transfemoral approach. We conclude that the transradial artery and superficial forearm venous approach for bilateral cardiac catheterizations is a safe and feasible alternative to the femoral approach in a wide range of patients, with the exception of patients with AS, ASD, or MS.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 27
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Cheng NJ, 2003, ACTA CARDIOL SIN, V19, P159
[2]  
Forssmann Werner., 1929, Klin Wochenshrift, V8, P2085
[3]   Vasospasms of the radial artery after the transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty [J].
Fukuda, N ;
Iwahara, S ;
Harada, A ;
Yokoyama, S ;
Akutsu, K ;
Takano, M ;
Kobayashi, A ;
Kurokawa, S ;
Izumi, T .
JAPANESE HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 45 (05) :723-731
[4]   Radial approach to right heart catheterization: Early experience with a promising technique [J].
Gilchrist, IC ;
Kharabsheh, S ;
Nickolaus, MJ ;
Reddy, R .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2002, 55 (01) :20-22
[5]   TRANSRADIAL ARTERY CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY [J].
KIEMENEIJ, F ;
LAARMAN, GJ ;
DEMELKER, E .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1995, 129 (01) :1-7
[6]   PERCUTANEOUS TRANSRADIAL ARTERY APPROACH FOR CORONARY PALMAZ-SCHATZ STENT IMPLANTATION [J].
KIEMENEIJ, F ;
LAARMAN, GJ .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1994, 128 (01) :167-174
[7]   A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: The access study [J].
Kiemeneij, F ;
Laarman, GJ ;
Odekerken, D ;
Slagboom, T ;
vanderWieken, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 29 (06) :1269-1275
[8]  
Wu CJ, 1997, CATHETER CARDIO DIAG, V40, P159, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199702)40:2<159::AID-CCD8>3.3.CO
[9]  
2-2
[10]   The safety and feasibility of transradial cutting balloon angioplasty - Immediate results, benefits, and limitations [J].
Yang, CH ;
Guo, GBF ;
Chang, HW ;
Yip, HK ;
Hsieh, K ;
Fang, CY ;
Chen, CJ ;
Hung, WC ;
Hang, CL ;
Wu, CJ .
JAPANESE HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 44 (01) :51-60