Researching feedback dialogue: an interactional analysis approach

被引:181
作者
Ajjawi, Rola [1 ]
Boud, David [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Ctr Med Educ, Dundee, Scotland
[2] Deakin Univ, Ctr Res Assessment & Digital Learning, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
feedback; dialogue; interactional analysis; methodology; qualitative research; CONSTRUCTION; INVOLVEMENT; SENSE; FOCUS; POWER;
D O I
10.1080/02602938.2015.1102863
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
A variety of understandings of feedback exist in the literature, which can broadly be categorised as cognitivist information transmission and socio-constructivist. Understanding feedback as information transmission or telling' has until recently been dominant. However, a socio-constructivist perspective of feedback posits that feedback should be dialogic and help to develop students' ability to monitor, evaluate and regulate their learning. This paper is positioned as part of the shift away from seeing feedback as input, to exploring feedback as a dialogical process focusing on effects, through presenting an innovative methodological approach to analysing feedback dialogues in situ. Interactional analysis adopts the premise that artefacts and technologies set up a social field, where understanding human-human and human-material activities and interactions is important. The paper suggests that this systematic approach to analysing dialogic feedback can enable insight into previously undocumented aspects of feedback, such as the interactional features that promote and sustain feedback dialogue. The paper discusses methodological issues in such analyses and implications for research on feedback.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 265
页数:14
相关论文
共 48 条
[31]   Feedback: focusing attention on engagement [J].
Price, Margaret ;
Handley, Karen ;
Millar, Jill .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 36 (08) :879-896
[32]   Feedback : all that effort, but what is the effect? [J].
Price, Margaret ;
Handley, Karen ;
Millar, Jill ;
O'Donovan, Berry .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 35 (03) :277-289
[33]   User involvement is a sine qua non, almost, in medical education: Learning with rather than just about health and social care service users [J].
Rees, C. E. ;
Knight, L. V. ;
Wilkinson, C. E. .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2007, 12 (03) :359-390
[34]   The construction of power in family medicine bedside teaching: a video observation study [J].
Rees, Charlotte E. ;
Ajjawi, Rola ;
Monrouxe, Lynn V. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2013, 47 (02) :154-165
[35]  
Rees Charlotte E, 2008, Commun Med, V5, P171
[36]  
Ritchie J., 2002, Analysing Qualitative Data, DOI [10.4135/9781412986274, DOI 10.4324/9780203413081_CHAPTER_9]
[37]   Feedback in action within bedside teaching encounters: a video ethnographic study [J].
Rizan, Chantelle ;
Elsey, Christopher ;
Lemon, Thomas ;
Grant, Andrew ;
Monrouxe, Lynn V. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2014, 48 (09) :902-920
[38]   Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal [J].
Sadler, D. Royce .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 35 (05) :535-550
[39]  
Sandstrom K.L., 2006, SYMBOLS SELVES SOCIA, V2nd
[40]   Features of assessment learners use to make informed self-assessments of clinical performance [J].
Sargeant, Joan ;
Eva, Kevin W. ;
Armson, Heather ;
Chesluk, Ben ;
Dornan, Tim ;
Holmboe, Eric ;
Lockyer, Jocelyn M. ;
Loney, Elaine ;
Mann, Karen V. ;
van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2011, 45 (06) :636-647