Safety-related regulatory actions for biologicals approved in the United States and the European Union

被引:167
作者
Giezen, Thijs J. [1 ,5 ]
Mantel-Teeuwisse, Aukje K. [1 ,5 ]
Straus, Sabine M. J. M. [5 ]
Schellekens, Huub [2 ,3 ]
Leufkens, Hubert G. M. [1 ,5 ]
Egberts, Antoine C. G. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht Inst Pharmaceut Sci, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacotherapy, NL-3508 TB Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Div Pharmaceut, NL-3508 TB Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Dept Innovat Sci, NL-3508 TB Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Clin Pharm, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Med Evaluat Board, The Hague, Netherlands
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2008年 / 300卷 / 16期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.300.16.1887
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Biologicals are a relatively new class of medicines that carry specific risks (eg, immunogenicity). However, limited information is available on the nature and timing of safety problems with their use that were identified after approval. Objective To determine the nature, frequency, and timing of safety-related regulatory actions for biologicals following approval in the United States and/or the European Union. Design and Setting Follow-up of a group of biologicals approved in the United States and/or European Union between January 1995 and June 2007. Vaccines, allergenic products, and products for further manufacture and transfusion purposes were excluded. Main Outcome Measures Nature, frequency, and timing of safety-related regulatory actions defined as (1) dear healthcare professional letters (United States) and direct healthcare professional communications (European Union), (2) black box warnings (United States), and (3) safety-related marketing withdrawals (United States and European Union) issued between January 1995 and June 2008. Results A total of 174 biologicals were approved (136 in the United States and 105 in the European Union, of which 67 were approved in both regions). Eighty-two safety-related regulatory actions (46 dear healthcare professional letters, 17 direct healthcare professional communications, 19 black box warnings, and no withdrawals) were issued for 41 of the 174 different biologicals (23.6%). The probability of a first safety-related regulatory action, derived from Kaplan-Meier analyses, was 14% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9%-19%) 3 years after approval and 29% (95% CI, 20%-37%) 10 years after approval. Biologicals first in class to obtain approval had a higher risk for a first safety-related regulatory action compared with later approved products in that class (12.0/1000 vs 2.9/1000 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 3.7 [95% CI, 1.5- 9.5]). Warnings mostly concerned the classes general disorders and administration site conditions, infections and infestations, immune system disorders and neoplasms benign, malignant, and unspecified. Conclusions The nature of safety problems identified after approval for biologicals is often related to the immunomodulatory effect (infections). Because the biologicals first to be approved in a class were more likely to be subjected to regulatory action, close monitoring is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:1887 / 1896
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[11]   Regulation of follow-on biologics [J].
Frank, Richard G. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (09) :841-843
[12]   Infectious complications of treatment with biologic agents [J].
Hamilton, CD .
CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2004, 16 (04) :393-398
[13]   Pharmacovigilance during the pre-approval phases - An evolving pharmaceutical industry model in response to ICH E2E, CIOMS VI, FDA and EMEA/CHMP risk-management guidelines [J].
Hartford, Craig G. ;
Petchel, Kasia S. ;
Mickail, Hani ;
Perez-Gutthann, Susana ;
McHale, Mary ;
Grana, John M. ;
Marquez, Paula .
DRUG SAFETY, 2006, 29 (08) :657-673
[14]   Immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals [J].
Kessler, Michele ;
Goldsmith, David ;
Schellekens, Huub .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 21 :9-12
[15]   Antibodies against erythropoietin and other protein-based therapeutics - An overview [J].
Kromminga, A ;
Schellekens, H .
AUTOIMMUNITY: CONCEPTS AND DIAGNOSIS AT THE CUTTING EDGE, 2005, 1050 :257-265
[16]   Timing of new black box warnings and withdrawals for prescription medications [J].
Lasser, KE ;
Allen, PD ;
Woolhandler, SJ ;
Himmelstein, DU ;
Wolfe, SN ;
Bor, DH .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (17) :2215-2220
[17]   Characteristics of topics in pharmacovigilance in The Netherlands [J].
Meyboom, RHB ;
Gribnau, FWJ ;
Hekster, YA ;
deKoning, GHP ;
Egberts, ACG .
CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 1996, 12 (04) :207-219
[18]   Differences in product information of biopharmaceuticals in the EU and the USA:: implications for product development [J].
Nieminen, O ;
Kurki, P ;
Nordström, K .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 2005, 60 (03) :319-326
[19]   Immunogenicity of rDNA-derived pharmaceuticals [J].
Ryff, JC ;
Schellekens, H .
TRENDS IN PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2002, 23 (06) :254-256
[20]   Follow-on biologics: challenges of the 'next generation' [J].
Schellekens, H .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 20 :31-36