Safety-related regulatory actions for biologicals approved in the United States and the European Union

被引:167
作者
Giezen, Thijs J. [1 ,5 ]
Mantel-Teeuwisse, Aukje K. [1 ,5 ]
Straus, Sabine M. J. M. [5 ]
Schellekens, Huub [2 ,3 ]
Leufkens, Hubert G. M. [1 ,5 ]
Egberts, Antoine C. G. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht Inst Pharmaceut Sci, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacotherapy, NL-3508 TB Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Div Pharmaceut, NL-3508 TB Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Dept Innovat Sci, NL-3508 TB Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Clin Pharm, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Med Evaluat Board, The Hague, Netherlands
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2008年 / 300卷 / 16期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.300.16.1887
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Biologicals are a relatively new class of medicines that carry specific risks (eg, immunogenicity). However, limited information is available on the nature and timing of safety problems with their use that were identified after approval. Objective To determine the nature, frequency, and timing of safety-related regulatory actions for biologicals following approval in the United States and/or the European Union. Design and Setting Follow-up of a group of biologicals approved in the United States and/or European Union between January 1995 and June 2007. Vaccines, allergenic products, and products for further manufacture and transfusion purposes were excluded. Main Outcome Measures Nature, frequency, and timing of safety-related regulatory actions defined as (1) dear healthcare professional letters (United States) and direct healthcare professional communications (European Union), (2) black box warnings (United States), and (3) safety-related marketing withdrawals (United States and European Union) issued between January 1995 and June 2008. Results A total of 174 biologicals were approved (136 in the United States and 105 in the European Union, of which 67 were approved in both regions). Eighty-two safety-related regulatory actions (46 dear healthcare professional letters, 17 direct healthcare professional communications, 19 black box warnings, and no withdrawals) were issued for 41 of the 174 different biologicals (23.6%). The probability of a first safety-related regulatory action, derived from Kaplan-Meier analyses, was 14% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9%-19%) 3 years after approval and 29% (95% CI, 20%-37%) 10 years after approval. Biologicals first in class to obtain approval had a higher risk for a first safety-related regulatory action compared with later approved products in that class (12.0/1000 vs 2.9/1000 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 3.7 [95% CI, 1.5- 9.5]). Warnings mostly concerned the classes general disorders and administration site conditions, infections and infestations, immune system disorders and neoplasms benign, malignant, and unspecified. Conclusions The nature of safety problems identified after approval for biologicals is often related to the immunomodulatory effect (infections). Because the biologicals first to be approved in a class were more likely to be subjected to regulatory action, close monitoring is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:1887 / 1896
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   What's fueling the biotech engine? [J].
Aggarwal, Saurabh .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2007, 25 (10) :1097-1104
[2]   Review of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and natalizumab [J].
Aksamit, Allen J. .
NEUROLOGIST, 2006, 12 (06) :293-298
[3]   DRUG SAFETY DISCONTINUATIONS IN THE UNITED-KINGDOM, THE UNITED-STATES, AND SPAIN FROM 1974 THROUGH 1993 - A REGULATORY PERSPECTIVE [J].
BAKKE, OM ;
MANOCCHIA, M ;
DEABAJO, F ;
KAITIN, KI ;
LASAGNA, L .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1995, 58 (01) :108-117
[4]   Early development of therapeutic biologics - Pharmacokinetics [J].
Baumann, A .
CURRENT DRUG METABOLISM, 2006, 7 (01) :15-21
[5]   Anti-TNF antibody therapy in rheumatoid arthritis and the risk of serious infections and malignancies - Systematic review and meta-analysis of rare harmful effects in randomized controlled trials [J].
Bongartz, T ;
Sutton, AJ ;
Sweeting, MJ ;
Buchan, I ;
Matteson, EL ;
Montori, V .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (19) :2275-2285
[6]   Safety of tumour necrosis factor and interleukin-1 blocking agents in rheumatic diseases [J].
Botsios, C .
AUTOIMMUNITY REVIEWS, 2005, 4 (03) :162-170
[7]   Preclinical safety testing of biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals - Understanding the issues and addressing the challenges [J].
Brennan, FR ;
Shaw, L ;
Wing, MG ;
Robinson, C .
MOLECULAR BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2004, 27 (01) :59-74
[8]   Combining enzyme specificity and tissue selectivity of cyclooxygenase inhibitors: towards better tolerability? [J].
Brune, K. ;
Furst, D. E. .
RHEUMATOLOGY, 2007, 46 (06) :911-919
[9]   Shifting paradigms: biopharmaceuticals versus low molecular weight drugs [J].
Crommelin, DJA ;
Storm, G ;
Verrijk, R ;
de Leede, L ;
Jiskoot, W ;
Hennink, WE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2003, 266 (1-2) :3-16
[10]  
*EUR COMM, 2007, VOL 9A RUL GOV MED P