Cost-effective integrated conservation and restoration priorities by trading off multiple ecosystem services

被引:29
作者
Mu, Yonglin [1 ]
Guo, Yun [2 ]
Li, Xiaowen [1 ]
Li, Peng [4 ]
Bai, Junhong [1 ]
Linke, Simon [3 ]
Cui, Baoshan [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Cont, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Ecol & Environm, Policy Res Ctr Environm & Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Australian Rivers Inst, Griffith Universtiy, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[4] Wetland Conservat Ctr, Wuhan Municipal Forestry & Pk Bur, Wuhan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecosystem services; Systematic conservation planning; Restoration; Marxan; Spatial prioritization; LAND-USE; ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION; FRESH-WATER; TERRESTRIAL; RESERVE; GREEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115915
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Conservation and restoration have long been regarded as two separate management avenues to maintain or enhance ecosystem functioning. Despite the commonalities in goals, restoration is generally considered a lower priority than conservation due to its generally greater cost, uncertainties in multiple trajectories and deals with already degraded habitats. However, when resources and opportunities for meeting conservation needs are limited, restoration could be an imperative avenue to provide additional benefits from conservation. The priority of conservation and restoration should be integrated based on an identical framework cost effectively to obtain the maximum ecological benefits with minimal costs. We propose a methodological framework to integrate conservation and restoration based on theories of Systematic Conservation Planning, which could identify best integrated conservation and restoration pattern in a cost-effective way on the basis of the provisions of multiple ecosystem services (i.e., carbon storage, water yield, soil retention and habitat quality). The trade-offs among four ecosystem services are assessed with an each of 10% increment in the target levels of ecosystem services. We demonstrated our approach at a regional scale, in the Dongting Lake Area, China. Our results showed that conservation is prioritized in a higher proportion of the study area when the targets are low. When the target level became higher, restoration gained more importance with growing area. This highlights that restoration pattern is indispensable when target setting become high and the integrated conservation and restoration planning is more cost efficient than that of conservation alone. Improving the carbon storage and soil retention would also contribute greatly to an increase in other ecosystems, but increasing the water yield and habitat quality would not guarantee an improvement for others. Integrated conservation and restoration planning will facilitate refine target achievement of conservation and restoration recommendations, by the trade-offs between conservation and restoration, and among different ecosystem services, our prioritization framework provides a useful insight in implementing the integrated planning, which can improve the efficiency in increasing ecosystem services compared to use either conservation or restoration ways.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   A benefit-cost comparison of varying scales and methods of coral reef restoration in the Philippines [J].
Abrina, Tara Alessandra S. ;
Bennett, Jeff .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 799
[2]   Selecting cost-effective areas for restoration of ecosystem services [J].
Adame, M. F. ;
Hermoso, V. ;
Perhans, K. ;
Lovelock, C. E. ;
Herrera-Silveira, J. A. .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2015, 29 (02) :493-502
[3]   Planning Across Freshwater and Terrestrial Realms: Cobenefits and Tradeoffs Between Conservation Actions [J].
Adams, Vanessa M. ;
Alvarez-Romero, Jorge G. ;
Carwardine, Josie ;
Cattarino, Lorenzo ;
Hermoso, Virgilio ;
Kennard, Mark J. ;
Linke, Simon ;
Pressey, Robert L. ;
Stoeckl, Natalie .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2014, 7 (05) :425-440
[4]  
Ball I.R., 2009, Marxan and Relatives: Software for Spatial Conservation Prioritization, DOI DOI 10.1111/EVA.12631
[5]   Cost-effective restoration and conservation planning in Green and Blue Infrastructure designs. A case study on the Intercontinental Biosphere Reserve of the Mediterranean: Andalusia (Spain) - Morocco [J].
Barbosa, Ana ;
Martin, Beatriz ;
Hermoso, Virgilio ;
Arevalo-Torres, Juan ;
Barbiere, Julian ;
Martinez-Lopez, Javier ;
Domisch, Sami ;
Langhans, Simone D. ;
Balbi, Stefano ;
Villa, Ferdinando ;
Delacamara, Gonzalo ;
Teixeira, Heliana ;
Nogueira, Antonio J. A. ;
Lillebo, Ana I. ;
Gil-Jimenez, Yolanda ;
McDonald, Hugh ;
Iglesias-Campos, Alejandro .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 652 :1463-1473
[6]   Coastal protection and conservation on sandy beaches and dunes: context-dependent tradeoffs in ecosystem service supply [J].
Biel, Reuben G. ;
Hacker, Sally D. ;
Ruggiero, Peter ;
Cohn, Nicholas ;
Seabloom, Eric W. .
ECOSPHERE, 2017, 8 (04)
[7]   What makes ecosystem restoration expensive? A systematic cost assessment of projects in Brazil [J].
Brancalion, Pedro H. S. ;
Meli, Paula ;
Tymus, Julio R. C. ;
Lenti, Felipe E. B. ;
Benini, Rubens M. ;
Silva, Ana Paula M. ;
Isernhagen, Ingo ;
Holl, Karen D. .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2019, 240
[8]  
Chen Y.Q., 2016, RES ECOCOMPENSATION, V5, P162
[9]   A multi-model approach to guide habitat conservation and restoration for the endangered San Bernardino kangaroo rat [J].
Chock, Rachel Y. ;
Hennessy, Sarah McCullough ;
Wang, Thea B. ;
Gray, Emily ;
Shier, Debra M. .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 21
[10]   A decision framework for identifying models to estimate forest ecosystem services gains from restoration [J].
Christin, Zachary L. ;
Bagstad, Kenneth J. ;
Verdone, Michael A. .
FOREST ECOSYSTEMS, 2016, 3