Evaluation of whole Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) for consolidated bioprocessing ethanol production

被引:40
作者
Kim, Seonghun [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Chul Ho [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Res Inst Biosci & Biotechnol, Jeonbuk Branch Inst, Jeongeup 580185, South Korea
[2] Korea Res Inst Biosci & Biotechnol, Synthet Glycobiol Res Unit, Jeongeup 580185, South Korea
关键词
Jerusalem artichoke; Consolidated bioprocessing; Diluted acid pretreatment; Alkali pretreatment; Kluyveromyces marxianus; Whole plant utilization; KLUYVEROMYCES-MARXIANUS; PRETREATMENT; HYDROLYSIS; BIOMASS;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2013.07.025
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
For consolidated bioprocessing (CBP), components of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L) tubers and stalks as a potential bioenergy crop were analyzed as carbon and nutrient sources, respectively. The effectiveness of chemical pretreatment with dilute acid or alkali was evaluated to develop a CBP method. Cellulose content, delignification, and enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency of the pretreated stalks were increased more effectively by NaOH treatment than dilute H2SO4 treatment. However, weight loss was greater during alkali pretreatment. Additionally, large volumes of water were required to wash the alkali-treated biomass. Therefore, CBP using the dilute acid-pretreated stalk and the ground tuber of Kluyveromyces marxianus were investigated. Fermentation of both pretreated stalks and tubers by K. marxianus with no nutrient supplementation proceeded acceptably. At 10% (w/v) stalk and 8% (w/v) tuber loading, K. marxianus produced 45.3 g/L ethanol after 30 h. The ethanol yield was 0.252 g ethanol per g dry biomass, or 0.32 g ethanol per g fermentable sugars, with a fermentable sugar conversion rate of 60%. These results suggest a cost-effective CBP strategy for bioethanol production from the whole Jerusalem artichoke plant. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 91
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Effect of pretreatment chemicals on xylose fermentation by Pichia stipitis [J].
Agbogbo, Frank K. ;
Wenger, Kevin S. .
BIOTECHNOLOGY LETTERS, 2006, 28 (24) :2065-2069
[2]   Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: A review [J].
Alvira, P. ;
Tomas-Pejo, E. ;
Ballesteros, M. ;
Negro, M. J. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 101 (13) :4851-4861
[3]  
Baldini M., 2011, Italian Journal of Agronomy, V6, pe20, DOI 10.4081/ija.2011.e20
[4]   Carbohydrates in Jerusalem artichoke powder suspension [J].
Bekers, M. ;
Grube, M. ;
Upite, D. ;
Kaminska, E. ;
Linde, R. ;
Scherbaka, R. ;
Danilevich, A. .
NUTRITION & FOOD SCIENCE, 2007, 37 (01) :42-+
[5]   SUGAR UTILIZATION BY YEAST DURING FERMENTATION [J].
DAMORE, T ;
RUSSELL, I ;
STEWART, GG .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1989, 4 (04) :315-324
[6]   The crop physiology of Helianthus tuberosus L: A model orientated view [J].
Denoroy, P .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 1996, 11 (01) :11-32
[7]   Clone precocity and the use of Helianthus tuberosus L. stems for bioethanol [J].
Dolores Curt, Maria ;
Aguado, Pedro ;
Sanz, Marina ;
Sanchez, Gema ;
Fernandez, Jesus .
INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2006, 24 (03) :314-320
[8]   Jerusalem artichoke pyrolysis: Energetic evaluation [J].
Encinar, J. M. ;
Gonzalez, J. F. ;
Martinez, G. ;
Roman, S. .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL AND APPLIED PYROLYSIS, 2009, 85 (1-2) :294-300
[9]   KINETICS OF BATCH FERMENTATIONS FOR ETHANOL-PRODUCTION WITH ZYMOMONAS-MOBILIS GROWING ON JERUSALEM-ARTICHOKE JUICE [J].
FAVELATORRES, E ;
ALLAIS, JJ ;
BARATTI, J .
BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 1986, 28 (06) :850-856
[10]   A biorefinery processing perspective: Treatment of lignocellulosic materials for the production of value-added products [J].
FitzPatrick, Michael ;
Champagne, Pascale ;
Cunningham, Michael F. ;
Whitney, Ralph A. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 101 (23) :8915-8922