Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation for treating depression: A modeling study

被引:52
|
作者
Csifcsak, Gabor [1 ]
Boayue, Nya Mehnwolo [1 ]
Puonti, Oula [2 ,3 ]
Thielscher, Axel [2 ,3 ]
Mittner, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Dept Psychol, Tromso, Norway
[2] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Elect Engn, Ctr Magnet Resonance, Lyngby, Denmark
[3] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Hvidovre, Ctr Funct & Diagnost Imaging & Res, Danish Res Ctr Magnet Resonance, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Transcranial direct current stimulation; tDCS; Depression; Computational modeling; Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; Medial prefrontal cortex; DORSOLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; MAJOR DEPRESSION; COGNITIVE-CONTROL; ELECTRIC-FIELD; DOUBLE-BLIND; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; CONTROLLED TRIAL; CURRENT THERAPY; DC STIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2018.02.077
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) above the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC) has been widely used to improve symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the effects of different stimulation protocols in the entire frontal lobe have not been investigated in a large sample including patient data. Methods: We used 38 head models created from structural magnetic resonance imaging data of 19 healthy adults and 19 MDD patients and applied computational modeling to simulate the spatial distribution of tDCS-induced electric fields (EFs) in 20 frontal regions. We evaluated effects of seven bipolar and two multi-electrode 4 x 1 tDCS protocols. Results: For bipolar montages, EFs were of comparable strength in the lDLPFC and in the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC). Depending on stimulation parameters, EF cortical maps varied to a considerable degree, but were found to be similar in controls and patients. 4 x 1 montages produced more localized, albeit weaker effects. Limitations: White matter anisotropy was not modeled. The relationship between EF strength and clinical response to tDCS could not be evaluated. Conclusions: In addition to lDLPFC stimulation, excitability changes in the MPFC should also be considered as a potential mechanism underlying clinical efficacy of bipolar montages. MDD-associated anatomical variations are not likely to substantially influence current flow. Individual modeling of tDCS protocols can substantially improve cortical targeting. We make recommendations for future research to explicitly test the contribution of lDLPFC vs. MPFC stimulation to therapeutic outcomes of tDCS in this disorder.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 173
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transcranial direct current stimulation: A new tool for neurostimulation
    Thibaut, A.
    Chatelle, C.
    Gosseries, O.
    Laureys, S.
    Bruno, M. -A.
    REVUE NEUROLOGIQUE, 2013, 169 (02) : 108 - 120
  • [22] Targeting the insula with transcranial direct current stimulation; A simulation study
    Kiabani, Negin Esmaeilzadeh
    Kazemi, Reza
    Hadipour, Abed L.
    Khomami, Sanaz
    Kalloch, Benjamin
    Hlawitschka, Mario
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING, 2023, 335
  • [23] Augmenting Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation With D-Cycloserine for Depression A Pilot study
    Chan, Herng-Nieng
    Alonzo, Angelo
    Martin, Donel M.
    Mitchell, Philip B.
    Sachdev, Perminder
    Loo, Colleen K.
    JOURNAL OF ECT, 2013, 29 (03) : 196 - 200
  • [24] Testing assumptions on prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation: Comparison of electrode montages using multimodal fMRI
    Woersching, Jana
    Padberg, Frank
    Goerigk, Stephan
    Heinz, Irmgard
    Bauer, Christine
    Plewnia, Christian
    Hasan, Alkomiet
    Ertl-Wagner, Birgit
    Keeser, Daniel
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2018, 11 (05) : 998 - 1007
  • [25] Enhancing cognitive control training with transcranial direct current stimulation: a systematic parameter study
    Weller, Simone
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Plewnia, Christian
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2020, 13 (05) : 1358 - 1369
  • [26] What Do We Know about Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Major Depression?
    Buchanan, Derrick Matthew
    Robaey, Philippe
    D'Angiulli, Amedeo
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2020, 10 (08)
  • [27] Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for depression: Results of nearly a decade of clinical research
    Palm, U.
    Ayache, S. S.
    Padberg, F.
    Lefaucheur, J. -P.
    ENCEPHALE-REVUE DE PSYCHIATRIE CLINIQUE BIOLOGIQUE ET THERAPEUTIQUE, 2016, 42 (01): : 39 - 47
  • [28] Transcranial direct current stimulation: a promising alternative for the treatment of major depression?
    Berlim, Marcelo T.
    Neto, Vitor Dias
    Turecki, Gustavo
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE PSIQUIATRIA, 2009, 31
  • [29] Transcranial direct current stimulation and emotion processing deficits in psychosis and depression
    Gupta, Tina
    Mittal, Vijay A.
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 271 (01) : 69 - 84
  • [30] Transcranial direct current stimulation as an augmenting intervention for depression
    Meena, Amit Kumar
    Sharma, Gautam
    Meena, Sunil Kumar
    Deshpande, Smita N.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 61 (09) : S629 - S629