TAN: A Distributed Algorithm for Dynamic Task Assignment in WSNs

被引:27
作者
Pilloni, Virginia [1 ]
Navaratnam, Pirabakaran [2 ]
Vural, Serdar [2 ]
Atzori, Luigi [1 ]
Tafazolli, Rahim [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cagliari, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, I-09123 Cagliari, Italy
[2] Univ Surrey, Ctr Commun Syst Res, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
关键词
Wireless sensor networks; task assignment; game theory; WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS; ALLOCATION; OPTIMIZATION; LIFETIME; GAME;
D O I
10.1109/JSEN.2013.2294540
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
We consider the scenario of wireless sensor networks where a given application has to be deployed and each application task has to be assigned to each node in the best possible way. Approaches where decisions on task execution are taken by a single central node can avoid the exchange of data packets between task execution nodes but cannot adapt to dynamic network conditions, and suffer from computational complexity. To address this issue, in this paper, we propose an adaptive and decentralized task allocation negotiation algorithm (TAN) for cluster network topologies. It is based on noncooperative game theory, where neighboring nodes engage in negotiations to maximize their own utility functions to agree on which of them should execute single application tasks. Performance is evaluated in a city scenario, where the urban streets are equipped with different sensors and the application target is the detection of the fastest way to reach a destination, and in random WSN scenarios. Comparisons are made with three other algorithms: 1) baseline setting with no task assignment to multiple nodes; 2) centralized task assignment lifetime optimization; and 3) a dynamic distributed algorithm, DLMA. The result is that TAN outperforms these algorithms in terms of application completion time and average energy consumption.
引用
收藏
页码:1266 / 1279
页数:14
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [11] An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks
    Heinzelman, WB
    Chandrakasan, AP
    Balakrishnan, H
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, 2002, 1 (04) : 660 - 670
  • [12] An Intelligent Task Allocation Scheme for Multihop Wireless Networks
    Jin, Yichao
    Jin, Jiong
    Gluhak, Alexander
    Moessner, Klaus
    Palaniswami, Marimuthu
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS, 2012, 23 (03) : 444 - 451
  • [13] Kaleci Burak, 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC 2010), P135, DOI 10.1109/ICSMC.2010.5642222
  • [14] BRANCH-AND-BOUND METHODS - A SURVEY
    LAWLER, EL
    WOOD, DE
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1966, 14 (04) : 699 - +
  • [15] Li Q., 2001, P DIMACS WORKSH PERV, P1
  • [16] Luo J, 2006, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V4026, P480
  • [17] Potential games
    Monderer, D
    Shapley, LS
    [J]. GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 1996, 14 (01) : 124 - 143
  • [18] Pearce JP, 2007, 20TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, P1446
  • [19] Deployment of Distributed Applications in Wireless Sensor Networks
    Pilloni, Virginia
    Atzori, Luigi
    [J]. SENSORS, 2011, 11 (08): : 7395 - 7419
  • [20] Ritzberger K., 2002, Foundations of non-cooperative game theory