A robust set-valued scenario approach for handling modeling risk in portfolio optimization

被引:7
|
作者
Zhu, Shushang [1 ]
Ji, Xiaodong [2 ]
Li, Duan [3 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sun Yat Sen Business Sch, Dept Finance & Investment, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Hebei Normal Univ, Coll Business, Shijiazhuang 050024, Hebei, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Syst Engn & Engn Management, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
portfolio optimization; downside risk; set-valued scenario; modeling risk; investment style; VALUE-AT-RISK; DOWNSIDE RISK; SELECTION; UNCERTAINTY; VARIANCE;
D O I
10.21314/JCF.2015.307
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
For portfolio optimization under downside risk measures, such as conditional value-at-risk or lower partial moments, we often invoke a scenario approach to approximate the high-dimensional integral involved when calculating risk. Consequently, two types of modeling risk may arise from this procedure: uncertainty in determining the distribution of asset returns and the error caused by approximating a given distribution with scenarios. To handle these two types of modeling risk within a unified framework, we propose a mathematically tractable set-valued scenario approach. More specifically, when short selling is not permitted, the robust portfolio selection problems modeled within a minimum-maximum decision framework using several types of set-valued scenarios can be translated into linear programs or second-order cone programs. These can be efficiently solved by the interior point method. The proposed set-valued scenario approach can be used not only as a methodology to alleviate the modeling risk but also as a useful tool for evaluating the impact of modeling risk. Our simulationanalysis and empirical study show that robustness does not necessarily imply conservativeness, portfolio performance is affected by the investment style characterized by the return-risk tradeoff to a large degree and modeling risk only becomes significant when an aggressive strategy is adopted.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 40
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Robust Mean-Conditional Value at Risk Portfolio Optimization
    Piri, Farzaneh
    Salahi, Maziar
    Mehrdoust, Farshid
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES, 2014, 3 (01): : 2 - 11
  • [22] An evolutionary computation approach to scenario-based risk-return portfolio optimization for general risk measures
    Hochreiter, Ronald
    APPLICATIONS OF EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4448 : 199 - 207
  • [23] A new distributionally robust reward-risk model for portfolio optimization
    Zhou, Yijia
    Xu, Lijun
    OPEN MATHEMATICS, 2024, 22 (01):
  • [24] Risk preference modeling with conditional average: an application to portfolio optimization
    Krzemienowski, Adam
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2009, 165 (01) : 67 - 95
  • [25] Robust reward-risk ratio portfolio optimization
    Sehgal, Ruchika
    Mehra, Aparna
    INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (04) : 2169 - 2190
  • [26] A Robust Portfolio Optimization Approach to System of System Architectures
    Davendralingam, Navindran
    DeLaurentis, Daniel. A.
    SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2015, 18 (03) : 269 - 283
  • [27] A Robust Statistics Approach to Minimum Variance Portfolio Optimization
    Yang, Liusha
    Couillet, Romain
    McKay, Matthew R.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2015, 63 (24) : 6684 - 6697
  • [28] Robust Portfolio Optimization with Respect to Spectral Risk Measures Under Correlation Uncertainty
    Tsang, Man Yiu
    Sit, Tony
    Wong, Hoi Ying
    APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND OPTIMIZATION, 2022, 86 (01):
  • [29] An approach to the portfolio optimization with the standardized risk measure
    Li, P
    Li, CL
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2003 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, VOLS I AND II, 2003, : 1629 - 1635
  • [30] Robust decision making over a set of random targets or risk-averse utilities with an application to portfolio optimization
    Hu, Jian
    Mehrotra, Sanjay
    IIE TRANSACTIONS, 2015, 47 (04) : 358 - 372