General and Maladaptive Traits in a Five-Factor Framework for DSM-5 in a University Student Sample

被引:185
作者
De Fruyt, Filip [1 ]
De Clercq, Barbara [1 ]
De Bolle, Marleen [1 ]
Wille, Bart [1 ]
Markon, Kristian [2 ]
Krueger, Robert F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Iowa, Iowa City, IA USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
Personality Inventory for DSM-5; PID-5; DSM-5; five-factor model; FFM; Revised NEO Personality Inventory; NEO-PI-3; personality disorders; general traits; assessment; IV PERSONALITY-DISORDERS; PSYCHOPATHOLOGY-5; PSY-5; DIMENSIONAL MODELS; CLASSIFICATION; ADOLESCENTS; INTEGRATION; CONTINUITY; COMPONENTS; INVENTORY; GENDER;
D O I
10.1177/1073191113475808
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The relationships between two measures proposed to describe personality pathology, that is the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-3) and the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), are examined in an undergraduate sample (N = 240). The NEO inventories are general trait measures, also considered relevant to assess disordered personality, whereas the PID-5 measure is specifically designed to assess pathological personality traits, as conceptualized in the DSM-5 proposal. A structural analysis of the 25 PID-5 traits confirmed the factor structure observed in the U.S. derivation sample, with higher order factors of Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Antagonism, Disinhibition, and Psychoticism. A joint factor analysis of, respectively, the NEO domains and their facets with the PID-5 traits showed that general and maladaptive traits are subsumed under an umbrella of five to six major dimensions that can be interpreted from the perspective of the five-factor model or the Personality Psychopathology Five. Implications for the assessment of personality pathology and the construction of models of psychopathology grounded in personality are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 307
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, DOI 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
[2]   On the Convergence Between PSY-5 Domains and PID-5 Domains and Facets: Implications for Assessment of DSM-5 Personality Traits [J].
Anderson, Jaime L. ;
Sellbom, Martin ;
Bagby, R. Michael ;
Quilty, Lena C. ;
Veltri, Carlo O. C. ;
Markon, Kristian E. ;
Krueger, Robert F. .
ASSESSMENT, 2013, 20 (03) :286-294
[3]  
Clark L., 1993, Manual for the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality
[4]   Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: Perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization [J].
Clark, Lee Anna .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 58 :227-257
[5]   An Other Perspective on Personality: Meta-Analytic Integration of Observers' Accuracy and Predictive Validity [J].
Connelly, Brian S. ;
Ones, Deniz S. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2010, 136 (06) :1092-1122
[6]   Bridging the Gap With the Five-Factor Model [J].
Costa, Paul T., Jr. ;
McCrae, Robert R. .
PERSONALITY DISORDERS-THEORY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2010, 1 (02) :127-130
[7]   Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings [J].
Costa, PT ;
Terracciano, A ;
McCrae, RR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 81 (02) :322-331
[8]  
Costa PT., 1992, NEO PI R PROFESSIONA
[9]   General Personality and Psychopathology in Referred and Nonreferred Children and Adolescents: An Investigation of Continuity, Pathoplasty, and Complication Models [J].
De Bolle, Marleen ;
Beyers, Wim ;
De Clercq, Barbara ;
De Fruyt, Filip .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 121 (04) :958-970
[10]   Assessing adolescents' personality with the NEO PI-R [J].
De Fruyt, F ;
Mervielde, I ;
Hoekstra, HA ;
Rolland, JP .
ASSESSMENT, 2000, 7 (04) :329-345