Data quality of surgery for carotid artery stenosis. Are the national vascular registries reliable?

被引:15
作者
Dahl, T
Rudjord, K
Altreuther, M
Myhre, HO [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Trondheim Hosp, St Olavs Hosp, Dept Surg, N-7006 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Circulat & Med Imaging, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
[3] SINTEF, Hlth Res, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
carotid surgery; registries; coding; completeness;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.11.014
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives. To study completeness of reporting carotid endarterectomies, including peri-operative stroke and mortality rate, in a national vascular registry, NorKfar, and a national administrative registry, The Norwegian Patient Register (NPR). Design. Comparative registry-based national study. Materials. Member hospitals of NorKar, including 89% of carotid endarterectomies in Norway, were compared With relevant data hi NPR for the years 2000-2002. Methods. We compared procedure-codes, diagnosis-codes, in-hospital death and the occurrence of peri-operative stroke after treatment for carotid artery stenosis in the two registries to evaluate completeness. Results. Compared with the NPR numbers, 16% of carotid endarterectomies were missing in the reports from member hospitals of NorKar. Further, during this three-year period, there Was an under-reporting of seven strokes and two deaths. The discrepancy zoos most pronounced in 2001. Conclusions. There is an under-reporting of patients operated on for carotid artery stenosis in NorKar according to NPR numbers as well as an under-reporting of early deaths and strokes. There is a need for better quality data in the NorKar Registry. Registry quality would be likely to improve if patient identifiable data were available in both registries.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 385
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Aardal Sidsel, 2005, Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, V125, P903
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1998, INT STAT CLASS DIS R
  • [3] Patients not included in medical audit have a worse outcome than those included
    Elfstrom, J
    Stubberod, A
    Troeng, T
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1996, 8 (02) : 153 - 157
  • [4] How to evaluate and improve the quality and credibility of an outcomes database: validation and feedback study on the UK Cardiac Surgery Experience
    Fine, LG
    Keogh, BE
    Cretin, S
    Orlando, M
    Gould, MM
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7379): : 25 - 28
  • [5] Registration and validity of surgical complications in colorectal cancer surgery
    Gunnarsson, U
    Seligsohn, E
    Jestin, P
    Påhlman, L
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (04) : 454 - 459
  • [6] Quality of data reported on abdominal aortic aneurysm repair -: A comparison between a national vascular and a national administrative registry
    Haug, ES
    Romundstad, P
    Sæther, OD
    Jorgenvåg, R
    Myhre, HO
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 29 (06) : 571 - 578
  • [7] *HLTH TECHN ASS, 2003, 8 HLTH TECHN ASS, P58
  • [8] Vascular registries -: are they worth the effort?
    Jensen, LP
    Troëng, T
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 20 (03) : 225 - 226
  • [9] Auditing a nationwide vascular registry - The 4-year Finnvasc experience
    Kantonen, I
    Lepantalo, M
    Salenius, JP
    Forsstrom, E
    Hakkarainen, T
    Huusari, H
    Jaakkola, A
    Kaarne, M
    Kaartinen, P
    Kivivuori, R
    Kostiainen, S
    Lehtonen, J
    Loponen, P
    Luther, M
    Maenpaa, I
    Nikula, P
    Riekkinen, H
    Rissanen, K
    Vilkko, P
    Ylonen, K
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1997, 14 (06) : 468 - 474
  • [10] Accuracy of clinical data in a population based vascular registry
    Laustsen, J
    Jensen, LP
    Hansen, AK
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 27 (02) : 216 - 219