A novel approach in electron beam radiation therapy of lips carcinoma: A Monte Carlo study

被引:8
作者
Shokrani, Parvaneh [1 ]
Baradaran-Ghahfarokhi, Milad [1 ,2 ]
Zadeh, Maryam Khorami [3 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Med Phys & Med Engn Dept, Esfahan 8174673461, Iran
[2] Isfahan Univ, Fac Adv Sci & Technol, Med Radiat Engn Dept, Esfahan 8174673441, Iran
[3] Ahwaz Jundishapour Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Med Phys, Ahvaz 1579461357, Iran
关键词
electron beam radiation therapy; lip carcinoma; Monte Carlo simulation; dose enhancement; BEAMnrc code; EYE SHIELDS; RADIOTHERAPY; LEAD; BACKSCATTER; TUNGSTEN;
D O I
10.1118/1.4795756
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is commonly treated by electron beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by a boost via brachytherapy. Considering the limitations associated with brachytherapy, in this study, a novel boosting technique in EBRT of lip carcinoma using an internal shield as an internal dose enhancer tool (IDET) was evaluated. An IDET is referred to a partially covered internal shield located behind the lip. It was intended to show that while the backscattered electrons are absorbed in the portion covered with a low atomic number material, they will enhance the target dose in the uncovered area. Methods: Monte-Carlo models of 6 and 8 MeV electron beams were developed using BEAMnrc code and were validated against experimental measurements. Using the developed models, dose distributions in a lip phantom were calculated and the effect of an IDET on target dose enhancement was evaluated. Typical lip thicknesses of 1.5 and 2.0 cm were considered. A 5 x 5 cm(2) of lead covered by 0.5 cm of polystyrene was used as an internal shield, while a 4 x 4 cm(2) uncovered area of the shield was used as the dose enhancer. Results: Using the IDET, the maximum dose enhancement as a percentage of dose at dmax of the unshielded field was 157.6% and 136.1% for 6 and 8 MeV beams, respectively. The best outcome was achieved for lip thickness of 1.5 cm and target thickness of less than 0.8 cm. For lateral dose coverage of planning target volume, the 80% isodose curve at the lip-IDET interface showed a 1.2 cm expansion, compared to the unshielded field. Conclusions: This study showed that a boost concomitant EBRT of lip is possible by modifying an internal shield into an IDET. This boosting method is especially applicable to cases in which brachytherapy faces limitations, such as small thicknesses of lips and targets located at the buccal surface of the lip. (C) 2013 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4795756]
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Bielajew A.F., 1984, NUCL INSTRUM METH B, V88, P535
[2]   Management of lower lip cancer: A retrospective analysis of 118 patients and review of the literature [J].
Bilkay, U ;
Kerem, H ;
Ozek, C ;
Gundogan, H ;
Guner, U ;
Gurler, T ;
Akin, Y .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2003, 50 (01) :43-50
[3]   Monte Carlo simulation of backscatter from lead for clinical electron beams using EGSnrc [J].
Chow, James C. L. ;
Grigorov, Grigor N. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (04) :1241-1250
[4]   Dosimetric dependence of the dimensional characteristics on a lead shield in electron radiotherapy: a Monte Carlo study [J].
Chow, James C. L. ;
Grigorov, Grigor N. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 10 (02) :75-91
[5]   Transmission and dose perturbations with high-Z materials in clinical electron beams [J].
Das, IJ ;
Cheng, CW ;
Mitra, RK ;
Kassaee, A ;
Tochner, Z ;
Solin, LJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (12) :3213-3221
[6]  
Dasher BG, 1994, PORTAL DESIGN RAD TH
[7]   A Monte Carlo investigation of electron backscattering [J].
Frujinoiu, C ;
Brey, RR .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2001, 97 (03) :223-229
[8]  
Kawrakow I., 2000, The EGSnrc Code System: Monte Carlo simulation of electron and photon transport
[9]  
Khan F, 2010, PHYS RAD THERAPY
[10]   Radiotherapy for locally advanced basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin [J].
Kwan, W ;
Wilson, D ;
Moravan, V .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (02) :406-411