Relaxation-time measurement via a time-dependent helicity balance model

被引:16
作者
Wrobel, J. S. [1 ]
Hansen, C. J. [1 ]
Jarboe, T. R. [1 ]
Smith, R. J. [1 ]
Hossack, A. C. [1 ]
Nelson, B. A. [1 ]
Marklin, G. J. [1 ]
Ennis, D. A. [1 ]
Akcay, C. [1 ]
Victor, B. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Aeronaut & Astronaut, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
MAGNETIC RECONNECTION; INJECTED TORUS; PLASMA; SUSTAINMENT; GENERATION;
D O I
10.1063/1.4773401
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
A time-dependent helicity balance model applied to a spheromak helicity-injection experiment enables the measurement of the relaxation time during the sustainment phase of the spheromak. The experiment, the Helicity Injected Torus with Steady Inductive helicity injection (HIT-SI), studies spheromak formation and sustainment through inductive helicity injection. The model captures the dominant plasma behavior seen during helicity injection in HIT-SI by using an empirical helicity-decay rate, a time-dependent helicity-injection rate, and a composite Taylor state to model both the helicity content of the system and to calculate the resulting spheromak current. During single-injector operations, both the amplitude and the phase of the periodic rise and fall of the toroidal current are predicted by this model, with an exchange of helicity between the injector states and the spheromak state proposed as the causal mechanism. This phenomenon allows for the comparison of the delay between the current rises in the experiment and the numerical model, enabling a measurement of the relaxation time. The measured relaxation time of 4.8 mu s +/- 2.8 mu s is shorter than the toroidal Alfven timescale. These results validate Hall MHD calculations of the Geospace Environmental Modeling challenge. (C) 2013 American Institute of Physics. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4773401]
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   OBSERVATIONS OF THE MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMIC DYNAMO EFFECT IN A SPHEROMAK PLASMA [J].
ALKARKHY, A ;
BROWNING, PK ;
CUNNINGHAM, G ;
GEE, SJ ;
RUSBRIDGE, MG .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1993, 70 (12) :1814-1817
[2]  
Bellan P., 2000, Spheromaks
[3]  
Birn J, 2001, J GEOPHYS RES-SPACE, V106, P3715, DOI 10.1029/1999JA900449
[4]   Two fluid effects on three-dimensional reconnection in the Swarthmore Spheromak Experiment with comparisons to space data [J].
Brown, M. R. ;
Cothran, C. D. ;
Fung, J. .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2006, 13 (05)
[5]  
Ennis D. A., 2010, Nuclear Fusion, V50, DOI 10.1088/0029-5515/50/7/072001
[6]   THE M=1 HELICITY SOURCE SPHEROMAK EXPERIMENT [J].
FERNANDEZ, JC ;
WRIGHT, BL ;
MARKLIN, GJ ;
PLATTS, DA ;
JARBOE, TR .
PHYSICS OF FLUIDS B-PLASMA PHYSICS, 1989, 1 (06) :1254-1270
[7]  
Finn J. M., 1985, Comments on Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, V9, P111
[8]   Current amplification in SPHEX operated as a spherical tokamak [J].
Gibson, KJ ;
Browning, PK ;
Gee, SJ ;
Woodruff, S ;
Willett, DM .
PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2000, 42 (12) :1331-1347
[9]   FORMATION OF A SPHEROMAK PLASMA CONFIGURATION [J].
GOLDENBAUM, GC ;
IRBY, JH ;
CHONG, YP ;
HART, GW .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1980, 44 (06) :393-396
[10]   Three-dimensional reconnection and relaxation of merging spheromak plasmas [J].
Gray, T. ;
Brown, M. R. ;
Cothran, C. D. ;
Lukin, V. S. .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2010, 17 (10)