Effect of Financial Incentives on Patient Use of Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:38
作者
Mehta, Shivan J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Pepe, Rebecca S. [1 ,5 ]
Gabler, Nicole B. [5 ]
Kanneganti, Mounika [5 ]
Reitz, Catherine [5 ]
Saia, Chelsea [5 ]
Teel, Joseph [5 ]
Asch, David A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
Volpp, Kevin G. [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
Doubeni, Chyke A. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Med, Perelman Sch Med, 3400 Civ Ctr Blvd,14-174 PCAM South Tower, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Penn Med Ctr Hlth Care Innovat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Leonard Davis Inst Hlth Econ, Ctr Hlth Incent & Behav Econ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Leonard & Madlyn Abramson Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Dept Family Med & Community Hlth, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Philadelphia VA Med Ctr, Ctr Hlth Equity Res & Promot, Philadelphia, PA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1156
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Mailing fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kits to patients' homes has been shown to boost colorectal cancer screening rates, but response rates remain limited, and organized programs typically require repeated outreach attempts. Behavioral economics has shown that offering salient financial incentives to patients may increase participation in preventive health. OBJECTIVE To compare the impact of different financial incentives for mailed FIT outreach. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This 4-parallel-arm randomized clinical trial included patients aged 50 to 75 years who had an established primary care clinician, at least 2 visits in the prior 2 years, and were eligible for colorectal cancer screening and not up-to-date. This study was conducted at urban primary care practices at an academic health system from December 2015 to February 2018. Data analysis was conducted from March 2018 to September 2018. INTERVENTIONS Eligible patients received a letter from their primary care clinician that included a mailed FIT kit and instructions for use. They were randomized in a 1: 1: 1: 1 ratio to receive (1) no financial incentive; (2) an unconditional $10 incentive included with the mailing; (3) a $10 incentive conditional on FIT completion; or (4) a conditional lottery with a 1-in-10 chance of winning $100 after FIT completion. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Fecal immunochemical test completion within 2 and 6 months of initial outreach. RESULTS A total of 897 participants were randomized, with a median age of 57 years (interquartile range, 52-62 years); 56% were women, and 69% were black. The overall completion rate across all arms was 23.5% at 2 months. The completion rate at 2 months was 26.0%(95% CI, 20.4%-32.3%) in the no incentive arm, 27.2%(95% CI, 21.5%-33.6%) in the unconditional incentive arm, 23.2%(95% CI, 17.9%-29.3%) in the conditional incentive arm, and 17.7%(95% CI, 13.0%-23.3%) in the lottery incentive arm. None of the arms with an incentive were statistically superior to the arm without incentive. The overall FIT completion rate across all arms was 28.9% at 6 months, and there was also no difference by arm. The completion rate at 6 months was 32.7%(95% CI, 26.6%-39.3%) in the no incentive arm, 31.7%(95% CI, 25.7%-38.2%) in the unconditional incentive arm, 26.8%(95% CI, 21.1%-33.1%) in the conditional incentive arm, and 24.3%(95% CI, 18.9%-30.5%) in the lottery incentive arm. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Mailed FIT resulted in high colorectal cancer screening response rates in this population, but different forms of financial incentives of the same expected value ($10) did not incrementally increase FIT completion rates. The incentive value may have been too small or financial incentives may not be effective in this context.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Conducting physician mail surveys on a limited budget - A randomized trial comparing $2 bill versus $5 bill incentives [J].
Asch, DA ;
Christakis, NA ;
Ubel, PA .
MEDICAL CARE, 1998, 36 (01) :95-99
[2]   Misdirections in Informed Consent - Impediments to Health Care Innovation [J].
Asch, David A. ;
Ziolek, Tracy A. ;
Mehta, Shivan J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 377 (15) :1412-1414
[3]   Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Across Healthcare Systems [J].
Burnett-Hartman, Andrea N. ;
Mehta, Shivan J. ;
Zheng, Yingye ;
Ghai, Nirupa R. ;
McLerran, Dale F. ;
Chubak, Jessica ;
Quinn, Virginia P. ;
Skinner, Celette Sugg ;
Corley, Douglas A. ;
Inadomi, John M. ;
Doubeni, Chyke A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 51 (04) :E107-E115
[4]   Effectiveness of an organized colorectal cancer screening program on increasing adherence in asymptomatic average-risk Canadians [J].
Charters, Thomas J. ;
Strumpf, Erin C. ;
Sewitch, Maida J. .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2013, 13
[5]   Racial disparities in the use of and indications for colorectal procedures in Medicare beneficiaries [J].
Cooper, GS ;
Koroukian, SM .
CANCER, 2004, 100 (02) :418-424
[6]   Effectiveness of a Clinic-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Promotion Program for Underserved Hispanics [J].
Coronado, Gloria D. ;
Golovaty, Ilya ;
Longton, Gary ;
Levy, Lisa ;
Jimenez, Ricardo .
CANCER, 2011, 117 (08) :1745-1754
[7]   Modifiable Failures in the Colorectal Cancer Screening Process and Their Association With Risk of Death [J].
Doubeni, Chyke A. ;
Fedewa, Stacey A. ;
Levin, Theodore R. ;
Jensen, Christopher D. ;
Saia, Chelsea ;
Zebrowski, Alexis M. ;
Quinn, Virginia P. ;
Rendle, Katharine A. ;
Zauber, Ann G. ;
Becerra-Culqui, Tracy A. ;
Mehta, Shivan J. ;
Fletcher, Robert H. ;
Schottinger, Joanne ;
Corley, Douglas A. .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 156 (01) :63-+
[8]   Socioeconomic and Racial Patterns of Colorectal Cancer Screening among Medicare Enrollees in 2000 to 2005 [J].
Doubeni, Chyke A. ;
Laiyemo, Adeyinka O. ;
Reed, George ;
Field, Terry S. ;
Fletchers, Robert H. .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2009, 18 (08) :2170-2175
[9]   Financial Incentives for Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Trial [J].
Gupta, Samir ;
Miller, Stacie ;
Koch, Mark ;
Berry, Emily ;
Anderson, Paula ;
Pruitt, Sandi L. ;
Borton, Eric ;
Hughes, Amy E. ;
Carter, Elizabeth ;
Hernandez, Sylvia ;
Pozos, Helen ;
Halm, Ethan A. ;
Gneezy, Ayelet ;
Lieberman, Alicea J. ;
Skinner, Celette Sugg ;
Argenbright, Keith ;
Balasubramanian, Bijal .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 111 (11) :1630-1636
[10]   The Impact of Alternative Incentive Schemes on Completion of Health Risk Assessments [J].
Haisley, Emily ;
Volpp, Kevin G. ;
Pellathy, Thomas ;
Loewenstein, George .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2012, 26 (03) :184-188