Characterization of aneurysm remnants after endovascular treatment: contrast-enhanced MR angiography versus catheter digital subtraction angiography

被引:47
|
作者
Agid, R. [1 ]
Willinsky, R. A. [1 ]
Lee, S. -K. [1 ]
TerBrugge, K. G. [1 ]
Farb, R. I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Toronto Western Hosp, Dept Med Imaging, Div Neuroradiol, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.3174/ajnr.A1124
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A substantial percentage of coiled aneurysms are associated with persistent filling of an aneurysmal component due to incomplete initial treatment or re-growth. Traditionally follow-up of coiled aneurysms has consisted of repeated intra-arterial cerebral catheter angiography, an invasive procedure with associated risks. Hence, many authors have advocated the use of non-invasive imaging techniques for this purpose. Our aim was to compare contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for depiction of aneurysmal remnants of coiled cerebral aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Aneurysms coiled between September 2003 and October 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. We included patients meeting the following criteria: 1) residual/recurrent aneurysm measuring 2 mm or greater, and 2) CE-MRA and DSA performed no more than 60 days apart. Three readers were asked to determine which technique was superior for characterization of the aneurysmal remnant: CE-MRA DSA, or indeterminate. Statistical analysis included most rule and kappa statistics. RESULTS: Of 232 patients who underwent coiling, 44 met the inclusion criteria (33 women and 11 men; 24-72 years of age). Sixteen patients had neck remnants and 28 had body remnants. The first study to identify the remnant was DSA in 35 patients and CE-MRA in 9. In 32 patients (32/44, 73%), the readers indicated that CE-MRA was superior to DSA for remnant characterization. CE-MRA and DSA were thought to be equivalent in 7 (16%), and DSA was preferred in 3 (7%). Two cases (5%) yielded ambiguous results. Of the 28 body remnants, 22 (78.6%) were characterized by remnant protrusion into the coil mass: In 20 of these (91 %), the readers preferred CE-MRA over DSA, and in 2 cases (9%), the techniques were thought to be equivalent. CONCLUSION: In patients with known aneurysm remnants, CE-MRA is at least equivalent to DSA for characterization of aneurysmal remnants after coiling. Contrast filling within the coil mass was more clearly seen with Cl than with DSA.
引用
收藏
页码:1570 / 1574
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Peripheral vascular occlusive disease: Evaluation with contrast-enhanced moving-bed MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography in 106 patients
    Loewe, C
    Schoder, M
    Rand, T
    Hoffmann, U
    Sailer, J
    Kos, T
    Lammer, J
    Thurnher, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (04) : 1013 - 1021
  • [22] High-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries: A prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography
    Fain, SB
    King, BF
    Breen, JF
    Kruger, DG
    Riederer, SJ
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 218 (02) : 481 - 490
  • [23] Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography
    P. Sundgren
    P. Sundén
    A. Lindgren
    J. Lanke
    S. Holtås
    E.-M. Larsson
    Neuroradiology, 2002, 44 : 592 - 599
  • [24] Comparison of contrast-enhanced multi-station MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography of the lower extremity arterial disease
    Burbelko, Mykhaylo
    Augsten, Michael
    Kalinowski, Marc O.
    Heverhagen, Johannes T.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 37 (06) : 1427 - 1435
  • [25] Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography
    Borisch, I
    Horn, M
    Butz, B
    Zorger, N
    Draganski, B
    Hoelscher, T
    Bogdahn, U
    Link, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2003, 24 (06) : 1117 - 1122
  • [26] Carotid artery stenosis:: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography
    Sundgren, PC
    Sundén, P
    Lindgren, A
    Lanke, J
    Holtås, S
    Larsson, EM
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2002, 44 (07) : 592 - 599
  • [27] Comparison of time-resolved CT-angiography, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography in a patient with a small type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair
    Sommer, Wieland H.
    Hoffmann, Ralf. T.
    Becker, Christoph R.
    Reiser, Maximilian F.
    Clevert, Dirk A.
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2010, 45 (01) : 19 - 25
  • [28] Contrast-enhanced MR angiography with frequency-dependent mask subtraction
    Du, Jiang
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 27 (10) : 1326 - 1332
  • [29] Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography in intracranial vascular abnormalities
    Takano, K
    Utsunomiya, H
    Ono, H
    Okazaki, M
    Tanaka, A
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1999, 9 (09) : 1909 - 1912
  • [30] Pedal Angiography in Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: First-Pass IV Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography with Blood Pool Contrast Medium Versus Intraarterial Digital Subtraction Angiography
    Kos, Sebastian
    Reisinger, Clemens
    Aschwanden, Markus
    Bongartz, Georg M.
    Jacob, Augustinus L.
    Bilecen, Deniz
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 192 (03) : 775 - 784