Testing wound dressings using an in vitro wound model

被引:62
作者
Lipp, C. [1 ]
Kirker, K. [1 ]
Agostinho, A. [1 ]
James, G. [1 ]
Stewart, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Montana State Univ, Ctr Biofilm Engn, Bozeman, MT 59717 USA
关键词
antimicrobial dressings; biofilms; plate counts; fluorescent microscopy; scanning electron microscopy; POLYHEXAMETHYLENE BIGUANIDE; HOSPITAL FABRICS; BIOFILM; SURVIVAL; EFFICACY; SILVER;
D O I
10.12968/jowc.2010.19.6.48468
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine whether or not there are any significant differences in the effects of wound dressings on bacterial bioburden. Method: A selection of non-occlusive, non-adhesive dressings was tested for their effect on bacterial bioburden. The dressings selected included two dressings with antimicrobial properties (one containing silver and one containing PHMB), a cotton-based dressing enclosed in a perforated sleeve of poly(ethylene terephthalate), a carboxymethyl cellulose-based dressing, a fibre-free alginate dressing, and a 12-ply 100% cotton gauze. Using the colony-drip flow reactor (DFR) model, a meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm was grown underneath a dressing sample. Biofilm growth was examined via plate counts, fluorescent microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Results: The dressings containing antimicrobial agents had the greatest effect on bacterial load. In the MRSA experiments, both antimicrobial dressings produced lower bacteria counts than the other dressings (p <= 0.001), while in the P. aeruginosa experiments, only the silver-containing sample had fewer bacteria (p <= 0.0001). However, neither antimicrobial dressing was able to completely eradicate the bacteria when testing with either microorganism. Conclusion: The results presented herein illustrate that bacteria can grow unchallenged within the dressing environment and that an antimicrobial dressing can limit this bacterial growth.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 226
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Role of antibiotic penetration limitation in Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm resistance to ampicillin and ciprofloxacin
    Anderl, JN
    Franklin, MJ
    Stewart, PS
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2000, 44 (07) : 1818 - 1824
  • [2] *ASTM INT, 2008, E264708 ASTM INT
  • [3] Why chronic wounds will not heal: a novel hypothesis
    Bjarnsholt, Thomas
    Kirketerp-Moller, Klaus
    Jensen, Peter Ostrup
    Madsen, Kit G.
    Phipps, Richard
    Krogfelt, Karen
    Hoiby, Niels
    Givskov, Michael
    [J]. WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2008, 16 (01) : 2 - 10
  • [4] Silver against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms
    Bjarnsholt, Thomas
    Kirketerp-Moller, Klaus
    Kristiansen, Soren
    Phipps, Richard
    Nielsen, Anne Kirstine
    Jensen, Peter Ostrup
    Hoiby, Niels
    Givskov, Michael
    [J]. APMIS, 2007, 115 (08) : 921 - 928
  • [5] Bowler P, 1998, WOUNDS, V10, P170
  • [6] Bowler P G, 1999, J Wound Care, V8, P499
  • [7] Bowler Philip G, 2003, Ostomy Wound Manage, V49, P44
  • [8] Comparative evaluation of biofilm disinfectant efficacy tests
    Buckingham-Meyer, Kelli
    Goeres, Darla M.
    Hamilton, Martin A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2007, 70 (02) : 236 - 244
  • [9] Castellano Joseph J, 2007, Int Wound J, V4, P114, DOI 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2007.00316.x
  • [10] Cazzaniga A, 2002, WOUNDS, V14, P169