Appropriate Gastrectomy Resection Margins for Early Gastric Carcinoma

被引:29
作者
Kim, Beom Su [1 ]
Oh, Seong Tae [1 ]
Yook, Jeong Hwan [1 ]
Kim, Hee Sung [1 ]
Lee, In Seob [1 ]
Kim, Byung Sik [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
early gastric cancer; resection margin; reresection; PROGNOSTIC IMPACT; CANCER; INVOLVEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/jso.23483
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
ObjectiveIn Korea and Japan, early gastric cancer (EGC) accounts for >50% of all gastric cancers. Here, we propose recommendations for the optimal distance from the tumor to the resection margins when evaluating EGC. Summary of Background DataThere are very few guidelines regarding the distance from the EGC tumor to the resection margins. MethodsWe evaluated 2,081 patients who underwent gastrectomy for EGC between January 1989 and May 2000. We subdivided tumors according to the distance from the proximal margin: 1, >1, 10, >10, 30, or >30mm. ResultsThree of five patients demonstrating distances 1mm between the tumor and gross proximal margin were microscopically positive. No patients with gross proximal margins >1, 10, >10, or 30mm were microscopically positive. There were no statistical differences in rates of microscopically positive margin, reresection, or reoperation between groups (P>0.05). In addition, there were statistical differences in terms of tumor recurrence and disease-related death between groups (P>0.05). ConclusionsWhen the resection margins are clear, we propose that margins >1mm are adequate for EGC gastrectomy. J. Surg. Oncol. 2014 109:198-201. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 201
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, J KOREAN GASTRIC CAN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, GASTRIC CANCER, V1, P10
[3]   ADEQUACY OF MARGINS OF RESECTION IN GASTRECTOMY FOR CANCER [J].
BOZZETTI, F ;
BONFANTI, G ;
BUFALINO, R ;
MENOTTI, V ;
PERSANO, S ;
ANDREOLA, S ;
DOCI, R ;
GENNARI, L .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1982, 196 (06) :685-690
[4]   Prognostic impact of resection margin involvement after extended (D2/D3) gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: A 15-year expereince at a single institute [J].
Cho, Byoung Chul ;
Jeung, Hei Cheul ;
Choi, Hye Jin ;
Rha, Sun Young ;
Hyung, Woo Jin ;
Cheong, Jae Ho ;
Noh, Sung Hoon ;
Chung, Hyun Cheol .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 95 (06) :461-468
[5]   State of the art in the treatment of gastric cancer: from the 71st Japanese Gastric Cancer Congress [J].
Masashi Fujii ;
Juei Sasaki ;
Toshifusa Nakajima .
Gastric Cancer, 1999, 2 (3) :151-157
[6]   Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3) [J].
Sano T. ;
Kodera Y. .
GASTRIC CANCER, 2011, 14 (02) :113-123
[7]  
Murakami T., 1971, Gann Monogr Cancer Res, V11, P53, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01654788
[8]   Prognostic Impact of Microscopic Positive Margin in Gastric Cancer Patients [J].
Nagata, Tomoyuki ;
Ichikawa, Daisuke ;
Komatsu, Shuhei ;
Inoue, Koji ;
Shiozaki, Atsushi ;
Fujiwara, Hitoshi ;
Okamoto, Kazuma ;
Sakakura, Chohei ;
Otsuji, Eigo .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 104 (06) :592-597
[9]   Systematic review of the predictors of positive margins in gastric cancer surgery and the effect on survival [J].
Raziee, Hamid Reza ;
Cardoso, Roberta ;
Seevaratnam, Rajini ;
Mahar, Alyson ;
Helyer, Lucy ;
Law, Calvin ;
Coburn, Natalie .
GASTRIC CANCER, 2012, 15 :S116-S124
[10]   No advantage of reoperation for positive resection margins in node positive gastric cancer patients? [J].
Sano, T ;
Mudan, SS .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 29 (06) :283-284