Is burn severity related to fire intensity? Observations from landscape scale remote sensing

被引:53
作者
Heward, Heather [1 ]
Smith, Alistair M. S. [1 ]
Roy, David P. [2 ]
Tinkham, Wade T. [1 ]
Hoffman, Chad M. [3 ]
Morgan, Penelope [1 ]
Lannom, Karen O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Idaho, Dept Forest Rangeland & Fire Sci, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[2] S Dakota State Univ, Geog Informat Sci Ctr Excellence, Brookings, SD 57007 USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Dept Forest & Rangeland Stewardship, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
MODIS; AREA; CONSUMPTION; RESPONSES; CLIMATE; VERSION; RATIO;
D O I
10.1071/WF12087
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Biomass burning by wildland fires has significant ecological, social and economic impacts. Satellite remote sensing provides direct measurements of radiative energy released by the fire (i.e. fire intensity) and surrogate measures of ecological change due to the fire (i.e. fire or burn severity). Despite anecdotal observations causally linking fire intensity with severity, the nature of any relationship has not been examined over extended spatial scales. We compare fire intensities defined by Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer Fire Radiative Power (MODIS FRP) products with Landsat-derived spectral burn severity indices for 16 fires across a vegetation structure continuum in the western United States. Per-pixel comparison of MODIS FRP data within individual fires with burn severity indices is not reliable because of known satellite temporal and spatial FRP undersampling. Across the fires, 69% of the variation in relative differenced normalized burn ratio was explained by the 90th percentile of MODIS FRP. Therefore, distributional MODIS FRP measures (median and 90th-percentile FRP) derived from multiple MODIS overpasses of the actively burning fire event may be used to predict potential long-term negative ecological effects for individual fires.
引用
收藏
页码:910 / 918
页数:9
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Ecohydrological consequences of drought- and infestation- triggered tree die-off: insights and hypotheses [J].
Adams, Henry D. ;
Luce, Charles H. ;
Breshears, David D. ;
Allen, Craig D. ;
Weiler, Markus ;
Hale, V. Cody ;
Smith, Alistair M. S. ;
Huxman, Travis E. .
ECOHYDROLOGY, 2012, 5 (02) :145-159
[2]   CALCULATING AND INTERPRETING FOREST FIRE INTENSITIES [J].
ALEXANDER, ME .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BOTANIQUE, 1982, 60 (04) :349-357
[3]   Southern African fire regimes as revealed by remote sensing [J].
Archibald, S. ;
Scholes, R. J. ;
Roy, D. P. ;
Roberts, G. ;
Boschetti, L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2010, 19 (07) :861-878
[4]  
Benson N.C., 2006, US. For. Serv. Gen. Tech Rep. RMRS-GTR-164-CD, P1, DOI DOI 10.2737/RMRS-GTR-164
[5]  
Borchert M.I., 1995, Brushfires in California Wildlands: Ecology and Resource Management Eds, P91
[6]   Strategies for the fusion of satellite fire radiative power with burned area data for fire radiative energy derivation [J].
Boschetti, Luigi ;
Roy, David P. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2009, 114
[7]  
Byram GeorgeM., 1959, FOREST FIRE CONTROL, P61, DOI DOI 10.2307/1932261
[8]   Comparison of burn severity assessments using Differenced Normalized Burn Ratio and ground data [J].
Cocke, AE ;
Fulé, PZ ;
Crouse, JE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2005, 14 (02) :189-198
[9]   Determining effects of area burned and fire severity on carbon cycling and emissions in Siberia [J].
Conard, SG ;
Sukhinin, AI ;
Stocks, BJ ;
Cahoon, DR ;
Davidenko, EP ;
Ivanova, GA .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2002, 55 (1-2) :197-211
[10]  
Daniel T.C., 2007, People, Fire, and Forests