Practice-Based Research Networks, Part I: Clinical Laboratories to Generate and Translate Research Findings Into Effective Patient Care

被引:10
作者
Sauers, Eric L. [1 ,2 ]
McLeod, Tamara C. Valovich [2 ]
Bay, R. Curtis [2 ]
机构
[1] AT Still Univ, Athlet Training Program, Arizona Sch Hlth Sci, Mesa, AZ 85206 USA
[2] AT Still Univ, Arizona Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Interdisciplinary Hlth Sci, Mesa, AZ 85206 USA
关键词
translational research; comparative effectiveness; clinical outcomes; HIPAA; FERPA; institutional review board; HEALTH-SERVICES RESEARCH; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT; STRENGTH; BOARDS; TRIALS;
D O I
10.4085/1062-6050-47.5.11
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Context: To improve patient care, athletic training clinicians and researchers should work together to translate research findings into clinical practice. Problems with patient care observed in clinical practice should be translated into research frameworks, where they can be studied. Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) provide a compelling model for linking clinicians and researchers so they can conduct translational research to improve patient care. Objective: To describe (1) the translational research model, (2) practice-based research as a mechanism for translating research findings into clinical practice, (3) the PBRN model and infrastructure, (4) the research potential using the PBRN model, and (5) protection of human participants in PBRN research. Description: Translational research is the process of transforming research findings into health behavior that ultimately serves the public and attempts to bridge the gap between research and clinical practice. Practice-based research represents the final step in the translational research continuum and describes research conducted by providers in clinical practices. The PBRNs are characterized by an organizational framework that transcends a single site or study and serves as the clinical research "laboratory" for conducting comparative-effectiveness studies using patient-oriented measures. The PBRN approach to research has many benefits, including enhanced generalizability of results, pooling of resources, rapid patient recruitment, and collaborative opportunities. However, multisite research also brings challenges related to the protection of human participants and institutional review board oversight. Clinical and Research Advantages: Athletic training studies frequently include relatively few participants and, consequently, are able to detect only large effects. The incidence of injury at a single site is sufficiently low that gathering enough data to adequately power a treatment study may take many years. Collaborative efforts across diverse clinical practice environments can yield larger patient samples to overcome the limitations inherent in single-site research efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 556
页数:8
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Agency for Health care Research and Quality, PRACT BAS RES NETW P
[2]  
Agency for Health care Research and Quality, PBRN REG
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, ATHL TRAIN ED COMP
[4]  
[Anonymous], EFF HLTH CAR PROGR G
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, NATA NEWS NOV, P16
[6]  
[Anonymous], ATHL TRAIN ED J
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2006, STAND PROF PRACT
[8]   Breaking the camel's back: Multicenter clinical trials and local institutional review boards [J].
Burman, WJ ;
Reves, RR ;
Cohn, DL ;
Schooley, RT .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (02) :152-157
[9]   Opening the black box: Cognitive strategies in family practice [J].
Christensen, RE ;
Fetters, MD ;
Green, LA .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2005, 3 (02) :144-150
[10]   Institutional Review Board training for community practices: Advice from the agency for Health Care Research and Quality Practice-based research network listserv [J].
Dolor, Rowena J. ;
Smith, Peter C. ;
Neale, Anne Victoria .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2008, 21 (04) :345-352