Mid- and long-term results of femoral component revision using the. cement-in-cement technique: Average 10.8-year follow-up study

被引:7
作者
Okuzu, Yaichiro [1 ]
Goto, Koji [1 ]
So, Kazutaka [1 ]
Kuroda, Yutaka [1 ]
Matsuda, Shuichi [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sakyo Ku, 54 Shogoin Kawaharacho, Kyoto 6068507, Japan
关键词
TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; STEM; FIXATION; EXCHANGE; TAPER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jos.2016.03.013
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Few reports are available on the long-term outcomes of femoral component revision by using the cement-in-cement technique. We report the mid- and long-term results of femoral component revision in total hip arthroplasty using the cement-in-cement technique. Methods: Between April 1996 and June 2009, 62 consecutive total hip arthroplasties with femoral component revision were performed in 57 patients by using the cement-in-cement technique. We retrospectively reviewed the cases with a follow-up period of at least five years. Three patients died, and two were lost to follow-up. Thus, 52 patients (57 hips), comprising 51 women and one man, were followed for average 10.8 years. Results: The mean Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip score improved from 57.6 points (range, 28-95 points) preoperatively to 79.8 points (range, 52-98 points) at one year postoperatively and to 77.4 points (range, 59-96 points) at the final follow up. Three revisions of the femoral component were necessary. One of the causes for the revision was a periprosthetic infection that occurred 20 months postoperatively. Another was aseptic loosening that occurred 99 months postoperatively and required revision of the acetabular component. The well-fixed femoral component was revised using the cement-in-cement technique at time of the acetabular revision. The third case was aseptic loosening of the femoral component that occurred 84 months postoperatively. The five-, 10-, and 15-year survival rates for the femoral re-revision due to any reason were 98.4%, 94.0%, and 94.0%, respectively. Conclusion: Use of the cement-in-cement technique for revision total hip arthroplasty resulted in good mid- and long-term radiological and clinical outcomes. (C) 2016 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:810 / 814
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[21]  
Rosenstein A, 1992, Proc Inst Mech Eng H, V206, P47, DOI 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1992_206_261_02
[22]   Investigation of stress shielding around the Stryker Omnifit and Exeter periprosthetic hip implants using an irreversible thermodynamic-based model [J].
Sayyidmousavi, Alireza ;
Bougherara, Habiba .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART B-APPLIED BIOMATERIALS, 2012, 100B (05) :1416-1424
[23]   Cement in Cement Revision of the Femoral Component Using a Collarless Triple Taper: A Midterm Clinical and Radiographic Assessment [J].
Stefanovich-Lawbuary, Natalija S. ;
Parry, Michael C. ;
Whitehouse, Michael R. ;
Blom, Ashley W. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (10) :2002-2006