Mid- and long-term results of femoral component revision using the. cement-in-cement technique: Average 10.8-year follow-up study

被引:7
作者
Okuzu, Yaichiro [1 ]
Goto, Koji [1 ]
So, Kazutaka [1 ]
Kuroda, Yutaka [1 ]
Matsuda, Shuichi [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sakyo Ku, 54 Shogoin Kawaharacho, Kyoto 6068507, Japan
关键词
TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; STEM; FIXATION; EXCHANGE; TAPER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jos.2016.03.013
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Few reports are available on the long-term outcomes of femoral component revision by using the cement-in-cement technique. We report the mid- and long-term results of femoral component revision in total hip arthroplasty using the cement-in-cement technique. Methods: Between April 1996 and June 2009, 62 consecutive total hip arthroplasties with femoral component revision were performed in 57 patients by using the cement-in-cement technique. We retrospectively reviewed the cases with a follow-up period of at least five years. Three patients died, and two were lost to follow-up. Thus, 52 patients (57 hips), comprising 51 women and one man, were followed for average 10.8 years. Results: The mean Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip score improved from 57.6 points (range, 28-95 points) preoperatively to 79.8 points (range, 52-98 points) at one year postoperatively and to 77.4 points (range, 59-96 points) at the final follow up. Three revisions of the femoral component were necessary. One of the causes for the revision was a periprosthetic infection that occurred 20 months postoperatively. Another was aseptic loosening that occurred 99 months postoperatively and required revision of the acetabular component. The well-fixed femoral component was revised using the cement-in-cement technique at time of the acetabular revision. The third case was aseptic loosening of the femoral component that occurred 84 months postoperatively. The five-, 10-, and 15-year survival rates for the femoral re-revision due to any reason were 98.4%, 94.0%, and 94.0%, respectively. Conclusion: Use of the cement-in-cement technique for revision total hip arthroplasty resulted in good mid- and long-term radiological and clinical outcomes. (C) 2016 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:810 / 814
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   EXPOSURE OF THE HIP BY ANTERIOR OSTEOTOMY OF THE GREATER TROCHANTER - A MODIFIED ANTEROLATERAL APPROACH [J].
DALL, D .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1986, 68 (03) :382-386
[2]   A well-fixed femoral stem facing a failed acetabular component: To exchange or not? A 5-to 15-year follow-up study [J].
de Thomasson, E. ;
Conso, C. ;
Mazel, C. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2012, 98 (01) :24-29
[3]  
DOHMAE Y, 1988, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P214
[4]   Revision of the cemented femoral stem using a cement-in-cement technique A FIVE-TO 15-YEAR REVIEW [J].
Duncan, W. W. ;
Hubble, M. J. W. ;
Howell, J. R. ;
Whitehouse, S. L. ;
Timperley, A. J. ;
Gie, G. A. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2009, 91B (05) :577-582
[5]  
Eftekhar N., 1978, PRINCIPLES TOTAL HIP
[6]  
Gardiner R, 1993, J Arthroplasty, V8, P517
[7]   Clinical and radiological evaluation of revision hip arthroplasty using the cement-in-cement technique [J].
Goto, K. ;
Kawanabe, K. ;
Akiyama, H. ;
Morimoto, T. ;
Nakamura, T. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2008, 90B (08) :1013-1018
[8]   POINTS IN TECHNIQUE OF RECEMENTING IN REVISION OF AN IMPLANT ARTHROPLASTY [J].
GREENWALD, AS ;
NARTEN, NC ;
WILDE, AH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1978, 60 (01) :107-110
[9]  
GRUEN TA, 1979, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P17
[10]   THE DIRECT LATERAL APPROACH TO THE HIP [J].
HARDINGE, K .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1982, 64 (01) :17-19