Humoral response to catumaxomab correlates with clinical outcome: Results of the pivotal phase II/III study in patients with malignant ascites

被引:69
作者
Ott, Marion G. [1 ]
Marme, Frederik [2 ]
Moldenhauer, Gerhard [3 ]
Lindhofer, Horst [4 ]
Hennig, Michael [1 ]
Spannagl, Rolf [1 ]
Essing, Mirko M. [1 ]
Linke, Rolf [1 ]
Seimetz, Diane [1 ]
机构
[1] Fresenius Biotech GmbH, Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Heidelberg Hosp, Natl Ctr Tumor Dis, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Natl Ctr Tumor Dis, German Canc Res Ctr, Translat Immunol Unit, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] TRION Pharma GmbH, Munich, Germany
关键词
catumaxomab; trifunctional antibody; malignant ascites; humoral response; clinical outcome; LASTING ANTITUMOR IMMUNITY; MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES; ACCESSORY CELLS; T-CELLS; INDUCTION; SURVIVAL; THERAPY; CANCER; ACTIVATION; BENEFIT;
D O I
10.1002/ijc.26258
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The trifunctional antibody catumaxomab is a targeted immunotherapy for the intraperitoneal treatment of malignant ascites. In a Phase II/III trial in cancer patients (n = 258) with malignant ascites, catumaxomab showed a clear clinical benefit vs. paracentesis and had an acceptable safety profile. Human antimouse antibodies (HAMAs), which could be associated with beneficial humoral effects and prolonged survival, may develop against catumaxomab as it is a mouse/rat antibody. This post hoc analysis investigated whether there was a correlation between the detection of HAMAs 8 days after the fourth catumaxomab infusion and clinical outcome. HAMA-positive and HAMA-negative patients in the catumaxomab group and patients in the control group were analyzed separately for all three clinical outcome measures (puncture-free survival, time to next puncture and overall survival) and compared to each other. There was a strong correlation between humoral response and clinical outcome: patients who developed HAMAs after catumaxomab showed significant improvement in all three clinical outcome measures vs. HAMA-negative patients. In the overall population in HAMA-positive vs. HAMA-negative patients, median puncture-free survival was 64 vs. 27 days (p < 0.0001; HR 0.330), median time to next therapeutic puncture was 104 vs. 46 days (p = 0.0002; HR 0.307) and median overall survival was 129 vs. 64 days (p = 0.0003; HR 0.433). Similar differences between HAMA-positive and HAMA-negative patients were seen in the ovarian, nonovarian and gastric cancer subgroups. In conclusion, HAMA development may be a biomarker for catumaxomab response and patients who developed HAMAs sooner derived greater benefit from catumaxomab treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:2195 / 2203
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Survival benefit associated with human anti-mouse antibody (HAMA) in patients with B-cell malignancies
    Azinovic, Ignacio
    DeNardo, Gerald L.
    Lamborn, Kathleen R.
    Mirick, Gary
    Goldstein, Desiree
    Bradt, Bonnie M.
    DeNardo, Sally J.
    [J]. CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY, 2006, 55 (12) : 1451 - 1458
  • [2] Belau A, 2007, J CLIN ONCOL, V25
  • [3] Oregovomab Maintenance Monoimmunotherapy Does Not Improve Outcomes in Advanced Ovarian Cancer
    Berek, Jonathan
    Taylor, Peyton
    McGuire, William
    Smith, L. Mary
    Schultes, Birgit
    Nicodemus, Christopher F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (03) : 418 - 425
  • [4] Functional and clinical consequences of Fc receptor polymorphic and copy number variants
    Bournazos, S.
    Woof, J. M.
    Hart, S. P.
    Dransfield, I.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2009, 157 (02) : 244 - 254
  • [5] Anti-GD2 antibody treatment of minimal residual stage 4 neuroblastoma diagnosed at more than 1 year of age
    Cheung, NKV
    Kushner, BH
    Cheung, IY
    Kramer, K
    Canete, A
    Gerald, W
    Bonilla, MA
    Finn, R
    Yeh, SJ
    Larson, SM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (09) : 3053 - 3060
  • [6] Cheung NKV, 2000, CLIN CANCER RES, V6, P2653
  • [7] DeNardo GL, 2003, CLIN CANCER RES, V9, p4013S
  • [8] Human antiglobulin response to foreign antibodies: therapeutic benefit?
    DeNardo, GL
    Bradt, BM
    Mirick, GR
    DeNardo, SJ
    [J]. CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY, 2003, 52 (05) : 309 - 316
  • [9] Dettmar K, 2010, P 101 ANN M AM ASS C, P844
  • [10] Have we overestimated the benefit of human(ized) antibodies?
    Getts, Daniel R.
    Getts, Meghann T.
    McCarthy, Derrick P.
    Chastain, Emily M. L.
    Miller, Stephen D.
    [J]. MABS, 2010, 2 (06) : 682 - 694