Stakeholder-associated risks and their interactions in complex green building projects: A social network model

被引:237
作者
Yang, Rebecca J. [1 ]
Zou, Patrick X. W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, Geelong, Vic 3218, Australia
[2] Univ Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
Risk analysis; Stakeholder relationship; Social Network Analysis; Green building project; INSTITUTIONAL BARRIERS; CONSTRUCTION; SUSTAINABILITY; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.12.014
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Previous research on risks in complex green building projects has been mainly focused on what the risks are and how they may impact on project objectives. Such studies have tended toward an inward looking perspective that treats risks in isolation from one another. In reality, most risks are interrelated and associated with internal or external project stakeholders. To address this research gap, this current research developed a Social Network Analysis (SNA) based stakeholder-associated risk analysis method to assess and analyse the risks and their interactions in complex green building projects. A case study was conducted to highlight the green-specific risks and their profiles, together with the proposed mitigation actions. The research results presented in this paper may broaden researchers and construction professionals' awareness of influential risks in green building projects and enhance their ability to perceive, understand, assess, and mitigate the risks in an effective and efficient way; thereby achieving higher performance in strategic risk management and stakeholder communication in green building project management. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 222
页数:15
相关论文
共 67 条
[51]   Identifying the critical factors for green construction - An empirical study in China [J].
Shi, Qian ;
Zuo, Jian ;
Huang, Rui ;
Huang, Jing ;
Pullen, Stephen .
HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 40 :1-8
[53]   The role of local governments in fostering 'green' buildings: a case study [J].
Theaker, IG ;
Cole, RJ .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2001, 29 (05) :394-408
[54]  
Thompson J.D., 2011, Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory
[55]  
Tiong RobertL. K., 1990, Construction Management Economics, V8, P315, DOI [10.1080/01446199000000026., DOI 10.1080/01446199000000026]
[56]  
UNIDO, 1996, GUID INFR DEV BOT PR
[57]   Social Sustainability Considerations during Planning and Design: Framework of Processes for Construction Projects [J].
Valdes-Vasquez, Rodolfo ;
Klotz, Leidy E. .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 139 (01) :80-89
[58]   Institutional barriers to sustainable construction [J].
van Bueren, EM ;
Priemus, H .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 2002, 29 (01) :75-86
[59]  
Wasserman S., 1994, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL
[60]   What is stopping sustainable building in England? Barriers experienced by stakeholders in delivering sustainable developments [J].
Williams, Katie ;
Dair, Carol .
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 15 (03) :135-147