Comparative cost evaluation of nuclear hydrogen production methods with the Hydrogen Economy Evaluation Program (HEEP)

被引:56
|
作者
El-Emam, Rami Salah [1 ,2 ]
Ozcan, Hasan [1 ]
Dincer, Ibrahim [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Inst Technol, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
[2] Mansoura Univ, Fac Engn, Mansoura, Egypt
[3] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Dept Mech Engn, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Nuclear hydrogen production; Hydrogen storage; Hydrogen transportation; Cost assessment; HEEP; IAEA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.12.098
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In this paper, a comparative cost assessment of some selected nuclear hydrogen production methods is performed with various options of hydrogen storage and transportation by employing Hydrogen Economy Evaluation Program (HEEP), as developed by International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). This HEEP software package is treated as one the most comprehensive ones with various nuclear hydrogen generation options. In the HEEP database, there are three different nuclear power plant options and three hydrogen production plant options included. The cost estimations for capital, fuel, decommissioning, O&M, and consumables are performed and evaluated in addition to the thermal energy and electricity cost details. These cost estimations include various hydrogen storage and transportation options. The hydrogen storage options considered are mainly compression, liquefaction and metal-hydride storage, which are available in the HEEP database. Furthermore, both pipeline and vehicle transportation costs are considered for cost calculations and evaluations. Copyright (C) 2014, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:11168 / 11177
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative evaluation of Mg-Ni hydrogen absorbing materials prepared by mechanical alloying
    Vijay, R
    Sundaresan, R
    Maiya, MP
    Murthy, SS
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2005, 30 (05) : 501 - 508
  • [22] Economic assessment of selected hydrogen production methods: A review
    Wang, Yan
    Zhang, Shaozong
    ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2017, 12 (11) : 1022 - 1029
  • [23] Analysis of internal heat exchange network and hydrogen production efficiency of iodine-sulfur cycle for nuclear hydrogen production
    Ni, Hang
    Qu, Xinhe
    Peng, Wei
    Zhao, Gang
    Zhang, Ping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 46 (11) : 15665 - 15682
  • [24] Hydrogen storage and refueling options: A performance evaluation
    Karayel, G. Kubilay
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2024, 191 : 1847 - 1858
  • [25] Advances in nuclear hydrogen production: Results from an IAEA international collaborative research project
    El-Emam, R. S.
    Khamis, I.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2019, 44 (35) : 19080 - 19088
  • [26] Evaluation of hydrogen storage capacities on individual adsorbents
    Jasminska, Natalia
    Brestovic, Tomas
    Puskar, Michal
    Grega, Robert
    Rajzinger, Jan
    Korba, Jan
    MEASUREMENT, 2014, 56 : 219 - 230
  • [27] Study on Energy Cascade Utilization of Hydrogen-electricity Cogeneration System Based on Nuclear Hydrogen Production
    Qu X.
    Zhao G.
    Wang J.
    Peng W.
    Yuanzineng Kexue Jishu/Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2021, 55 : 37 - 44
  • [28] Comparative evaluation of sizing of metal hydride (MH) hydrogen storage tank filled with different alloys
    Hilali, Ismail
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREEN ENERGY, 2016, 13 (09) : 911 - 917
  • [29] Influence of obstacle morphology on safety of nuclear hydrogen production system
    Gao, Qunxiang
    Qu, Xinhe
    Peng, Wei
    Zhang, Ping
    Chen, Songzhe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2022, 47 (86) : 36733 - 36748
  • [30] IAEA Activities on Application of Nuclear Techniques in Development and Characterization of Materials for Hydrogen Economy
    Salame, Petra
    Zeman, Andrej
    Mulhauser, Francoise
    ADVANCES IN INNOVATIVE MATERIALS AND APPLICATIONS, 2011, 324 : 461 - +