Enhancement characteristics of liver metastases, hepatocellular carcinomas, and hemangiomas with Gd-EOB-DTPA: Preliminary results with dynamic MR imaging

被引:122
作者
Reimer, P [1 ]
Rummeny, EJ [1 ]
Daldrup, HE [1 ]
Hesse, T [1 ]
Balzer, T [1 ]
Tombach, B [1 ]
Peters, PE [1 ]
机构
[1] SCHERING AG,D-1000 BERLIN,GERMANY
关键词
MRI; liver; Gd-EOB-DTPA; characterization;
D O I
10.1007/s003300050150
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Our objective was to study Gd-EOB-DTPA for the characterization of focal liver lesions by means of dynamic MR imaging. A double-blind and randomized dose-ranging phase-2 clinical trial was performed in 31 patients (liver metastases n = 23, hepatocellular carcinoma n = 4, and hemangioma n = 4) at a field strength of 1.0 Tesla. Gd-EOB-DTPA (Schering AG, Berlin, Germany) was administered as an IV bolus (12.5, 25, or 50 mu mol/kg body weight) with dynamic T1-weighted MRI during the distribution and cellular uptake of the contrast agent at multiple time points up to 45 min post contrast. Dynamic changes in tumor signal intensity, tumor-liver contrast, enhancement patterns, side effects, and adverse events were evaluated. Monitoring of vital signs revealed no significant changes during bolus injection of Gd-EOB-DTPA. Liver metastases demonstrated an inhomogeneous uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA during the distribution phase with a washout effect on delayed images > 3 min and highest tumor-liver contrast 20 and 45 min post contrast. Hepatocellular carcinomas showed prolonged enhancement as compared with metastases and hemangiomas. Hemangiomas exhibited an early peripheral-nodular enhancement with subsequent partial or complete filling, persisting enhancement < 10 min following injection of Gd-EOB-DTPA, and delayed washout as compared with liver metastases. Initial clinical experience suggests that Gd-EOB-DTPA as a bolus injectable hepatobiliary MR contrast agent may offer useful features for the characterization of focal liver lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 280
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Armitage P, 1987, Statistical methods in medical research, V2nd
[2]   HEPATIC MR IMAGING WITH MN-DPDP - SAFETY, IMAGE QUALITY, AND SENSITIVITY [J].
BERNARDINO, ME ;
YOUNG, SW ;
LEE, JKT ;
WEINREB, JC .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 183 (01) :53-58
[3]  
BRASCH RC, 1992, RADIOLOGY, V183, P1
[4]   EVALUATION OF RADIATION-INDUCED LIVER-INJURY WITH MR-IMAGING - COMPARISON OF HEPATOCELLULAR AND RETICULOENDOTHELIAL CONTRAST AGENTS [J].
CLEMENT, O ;
MUHLER, A ;
VEXLER, VS ;
ROSENAU, W ;
BERTHEZENE, Y ;
KUWATSURU, R ;
BRASCH, RC .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 (01) :163-168
[5]  
CLEMENT O, 1992, INVEST RADIOL, V27, P612
[6]  
CLEMENT O, 1993, JMRI-J MAGN RESON IM, V3, P1
[7]   FOCAL LIVER-LESIONS - CHARACTERIZATION WITH NONENHANCED AND DYNAMIC CONTRAST MATERIAL-ENHANCED MR-IMAGING [J].
HAMM, B ;
THOENI, RF ;
GOULD, RG ;
BERNARDINO, ME ;
LUNING, M ;
SAINI, S ;
MAHFOUZ, AE ;
TAUPITZ, M ;
WOLF, KJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 190 (02) :417-423
[8]   FOCAL LIVER-LESIONS - MR IMAGING WITH MN-DPDP - INITIAL CLINICAL-RESULTS IN 40 PATIENTS [J].
HAMM, B ;
VOGL, TJ ;
BRANDING, G ;
SCHNELL, B ;
TAUPITZ, M ;
WOLF, KJ ;
LISSNER, J .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 182 (01) :167-174
[9]   PHASE-I CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF GD-EOB-DTPA AS A HEPATOBILIARY MR CONTRAST AGENT - SAFETY, PHARMACOKINETICS, AND MR-IMAGING [J].
HAMM, B ;
STAKS, T ;
MUHLER, A ;
BOLLOW, M ;
TAUPITZ, M ;
FRENZEL, T ;
WOLF, KJ ;
WEINMANN, HJ ;
LANGE, L .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 195 (03) :785-792
[10]   HYPERVASCULAR LIVER-LESIONS - DIFFERENTIATION OF FOCAL NODULAR HYPERPLASIA FROM MALIGNANT-TUMORS WITH DYNAMIC GADOLINIUM-ENHANCED MR IMAGING [J].
MAHFOUZ, AE ;
HAMM, B ;
TAUPITZ, M ;
WOLF, KJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 186 (01) :133-138