Enhancement characteristics of liver metastases, hepatocellular carcinomas, and hemangiomas with Gd-EOB-DTPA: Preliminary results with dynamic MR imaging

被引:122
作者
Reimer, P [1 ]
Rummeny, EJ [1 ]
Daldrup, HE [1 ]
Hesse, T [1 ]
Balzer, T [1 ]
Tombach, B [1 ]
Peters, PE [1 ]
机构
[1] SCHERING AG,D-1000 BERLIN,GERMANY
关键词
MRI; liver; Gd-EOB-DTPA; characterization;
D O I
10.1007/s003300050150
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Our objective was to study Gd-EOB-DTPA for the characterization of focal liver lesions by means of dynamic MR imaging. A double-blind and randomized dose-ranging phase-2 clinical trial was performed in 31 patients (liver metastases n = 23, hepatocellular carcinoma n = 4, and hemangioma n = 4) at a field strength of 1.0 Tesla. Gd-EOB-DTPA (Schering AG, Berlin, Germany) was administered as an IV bolus (12.5, 25, or 50 mu mol/kg body weight) with dynamic T1-weighted MRI during the distribution and cellular uptake of the contrast agent at multiple time points up to 45 min post contrast. Dynamic changes in tumor signal intensity, tumor-liver contrast, enhancement patterns, side effects, and adverse events were evaluated. Monitoring of vital signs revealed no significant changes during bolus injection of Gd-EOB-DTPA. Liver metastases demonstrated an inhomogeneous uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA during the distribution phase with a washout effect on delayed images > 3 min and highest tumor-liver contrast 20 and 45 min post contrast. Hepatocellular carcinomas showed prolonged enhancement as compared with metastases and hemangiomas. Hemangiomas exhibited an early peripheral-nodular enhancement with subsequent partial or complete filling, persisting enhancement < 10 min following injection of Gd-EOB-DTPA, and delayed washout as compared with liver metastases. Initial clinical experience suggests that Gd-EOB-DTPA as a bolus injectable hepatobiliary MR contrast agent may offer useful features for the characterization of focal liver lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 280
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Armitage P, 1987, Statistical methods in medical research, V2nd
  • [2] HEPATIC MR IMAGING WITH MN-DPDP - SAFETY, IMAGE QUALITY, AND SENSITIVITY
    BERNARDINO, ME
    YOUNG, SW
    LEE, JKT
    WEINREB, JC
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1992, 183 (01) : 53 - 58
  • [3] BRASCH RC, 1992, RADIOLOGY, V183, P1
  • [4] EVALUATION OF RADIATION-INDUCED LIVER-INJURY WITH MR-IMAGING - COMPARISON OF HEPATOCELLULAR AND RETICULOENDOTHELIAL CONTRAST AGENTS
    CLEMENT, O
    MUHLER, A
    VEXLER, VS
    ROSENAU, W
    BERTHEZENE, Y
    KUWATSURU, R
    BRASCH, RC
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 (01) : 163 - 168
  • [5] CLEMENT O, 1992, INVEST RADIOL, V27, P612
  • [6] CLEMENT O, 1993, JMRI-J MAGN RESON IM, V3, P1
  • [7] FOCAL LIVER-LESIONS - CHARACTERIZATION WITH NONENHANCED AND DYNAMIC CONTRAST MATERIAL-ENHANCED MR-IMAGING
    HAMM, B
    THOENI, RF
    GOULD, RG
    BERNARDINO, ME
    LUNING, M
    SAINI, S
    MAHFOUZ, AE
    TAUPITZ, M
    WOLF, KJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1994, 190 (02) : 417 - 423
  • [8] FOCAL LIVER-LESIONS - MR IMAGING WITH MN-DPDP - INITIAL CLINICAL-RESULTS IN 40 PATIENTS
    HAMM, B
    VOGL, TJ
    BRANDING, G
    SCHNELL, B
    TAUPITZ, M
    WOLF, KJ
    LISSNER, J
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1992, 182 (01) : 167 - 174
  • [9] PHASE-I CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF GD-EOB-DTPA AS A HEPATOBILIARY MR CONTRAST AGENT - SAFETY, PHARMACOKINETICS, AND MR-IMAGING
    HAMM, B
    STAKS, T
    MUHLER, A
    BOLLOW, M
    TAUPITZ, M
    FRENZEL, T
    WOLF, KJ
    WEINMANN, HJ
    LANGE, L
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1995, 195 (03) : 785 - 792
  • [10] HYPERVASCULAR LIVER-LESIONS - DIFFERENTIATION OF FOCAL NODULAR HYPERPLASIA FROM MALIGNANT-TUMORS WITH DYNAMIC GADOLINIUM-ENHANCED MR IMAGING
    MAHFOUZ, AE
    HAMM, B
    TAUPITZ, M
    WOLF, KJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1993, 186 (01) : 133 - 138