Deterministic and random FEM analysis of full-scale unreinforced and reinforced embankments

被引:31
作者
Luo, N. [1 ]
Bathurst, R. J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Dept Civil Engn, GeoEngn Ctr Queens RMC, Ellis Hall, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[2] Royal Mil Coll Canada, Dept Civil Engn, GeoEngn Ctr Queens RMC, 13 Gen Crerar,Sawyer Bldg,Room 3417, Kingston, ON K7K 7B4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Geosynthetics; Finite element method; Random finite element method; Random field; Numerical simulation; Bearing capacity; Embankment; Reinforcement; FINITE-ELEMENT-METHOD; EARTH-FILL DAMS; BEARING CAPACITY; GEOGRID REINFORCEMENT; INSTALLATION DAMAGE; STABILITY ANALYSIS; SLOPES; FOOTINGS; SOIL; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1680/jgein.17.00040
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
This paper presents the results of numerical simulations of one physical full-scale unreinforced embankment and two reinforced embankments taken to failure using a strip footing. The embankments were 3.4 m in height and were constructed with the same slope using the same sand backfill. One reinforced embankment was constructed with a relatively weak and extensible geogrid material and the other with a relatively stronger and stiffer geogrid product. Deterministic finite element method (FEM) and random finite element method (RFEM) analyses were carried out and the results compared to observed performance. Analyses were performed assuming vertical spatial variability in soil strength at a scale of fluctuation matching the compaction lift thickness of the physical tests and treating the soil as a random (homogeneous) material. Both deterministic and probabilistic analyses showed good agreement with the measured bearing capacity of the footing in each full-scale test. However, the assumption of vertically anisotropic spatial variability in soil strength was shown to achieve a better match with the observed failure mechanism in each of the embankments.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 179
页数:16
相关论文
共 45 条
[11]   HYPERBOLIC PARAMETERS FOR COMPACTED SOILS [J].
BOSCARDIN, MD ;
SELIG, ET ;
LIN, RS ;
YANG, GR .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1990, 116 (01) :88-104
[12]  
Bush D. I., 1987, APPL POLYM REINFORCE, V147, P173
[13]   POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS OF FINITE-ELEMENTS FOR LIMIT ANALYSIS [J].
DEBORST, R ;
VERMEER, PA .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 1984, 34 (02) :199-210
[14]  
Duncan J.M., 1970, J SOIL MECH FDN ENG, V96, P1629, DOI [10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001458, DOI 10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001458]
[15]   Nonlinear load-strain modeling of polypropylene geogrids during constant rate-of-strain loading [J].
Ezzein, Fawzy M. ;
Bathurst, Richard J. ;
Kongkitkul, Warat .
POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, 2015, 55 (07) :1617-1627
[16]   SIMULATION OF RANDOM-FIELDS VIA LOCAL AVERAGE SUBDIVISION [J].
FENTON, GA ;
VANMARCKE, EH .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 1990, 116 (08) :1733-1749
[17]  
Fenton GA, 2008, Risk assessment in geotechnical engineering, V461
[18]  
Frydman S., 1997, GEOTECH GEOENVIRON E, V123, P20, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:1(20)
[19]   Strain measurement and interpretation of stabilising force in geogrid reinforcement [J].
Gnanendran, CT ;
Selvadurai, APS .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2001, 19 (03) :177-194
[20]   STRESS CHARACTERISTICS FOR SHALLOW FOOTINGS IN COHESIONLESS SLOPES [J].
GRAHAM, J ;
ANDREWS, M ;
SHIELDS, DH .
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 1988, 25 (02) :238-249