Deterministic and random FEM analysis of full-scale unreinforced and reinforced embankments

被引:31
作者
Luo, N. [1 ]
Bathurst, R. J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Dept Civil Engn, GeoEngn Ctr Queens RMC, Ellis Hall, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[2] Royal Mil Coll Canada, Dept Civil Engn, GeoEngn Ctr Queens RMC, 13 Gen Crerar,Sawyer Bldg,Room 3417, Kingston, ON K7K 7B4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Geosynthetics; Finite element method; Random finite element method; Random field; Numerical simulation; Bearing capacity; Embankment; Reinforcement; FINITE-ELEMENT-METHOD; EARTH-FILL DAMS; BEARING CAPACITY; GEOGRID REINFORCEMENT; INSTALLATION DAMAGE; STABILITY ANALYSIS; SLOPES; FOOTINGS; SOIL; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1680/jgein.17.00040
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
This paper presents the results of numerical simulations of one physical full-scale unreinforced embankment and two reinforced embankments taken to failure using a strip footing. The embankments were 3.4 m in height and were constructed with the same slope using the same sand backfill. One reinforced embankment was constructed with a relatively weak and extensible geogrid material and the other with a relatively stronger and stiffer geogrid product. Deterministic finite element method (FEM) and random finite element method (RFEM) analyses were carried out and the results compared to observed performance. Analyses were performed assuming vertical spatial variability in soil strength at a scale of fluctuation matching the compaction lift thickness of the physical tests and treating the soil as a random (homogeneous) material. Both deterministic and probabilistic analyses showed good agreement with the measured bearing capacity of the footing in each full-scale test. However, the assumption of vertically anisotropic spatial variability in soil strength was shown to achieve a better match with the observed failure mechanism in each of the embankments.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 179
页数:16
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Bearing capacity of strip footings on sand slopes reinforced with geogrid and grid-anchor [J].
Alamshahi, Saeed ;
Hataf, Nader .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2009, 27 (03) :217-226
[2]   Design and Performance of 6.3-m-High, Block-Faced Geogrid Wall Designed Using K-Stiffness Method [J].
Allen, Tony M. ;
Bathurst, Richard J. .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 140 (02)
[3]   Performance of an 11 m high block-faced geogrid wall designed using the K-stiffness method [J].
Allen, Tony M. ;
Bathurst, Richard J. .
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 51 (01) :16-29
[4]  
Bathurst R.J., 1993, P SOIL REINF FULL SC, P401
[5]  
Bathurst R.J., 1990, TRANSPORT RES REC, V1288, P109
[6]   Reliability-based analysis of combined installation damage and creep for the tensile rupture limit state of geogrid reinforcement in Japan [J].
Bathurst, Richard J. ;
Miyata, Yoshihisa .
SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2015, 55 (02) :437-446
[7]   Analysis of installation damage tests for LRFD calibration of reinforced soil structures [J].
Bathurst, Richard J. ;
Huang, Bingquan ;
Allen, Tony M. .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2011, 29 (03) :323-334
[8]   Performance of instrumented large-scale unreinforced and reinforced embankments loaded by a strip footing to failure [J].
Bathurst, RJ ;
Blatz, JA ;
Burger, MH .
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 40 (06) :1067-1083
[9]   Limit equilibrium analysis of large-scale reinforced and unreinforced embankments loaded by a strip footing [J].
Blatz, JA ;
Bathurst, RJ .
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 40 (06) :1084-1092
[10]   THE STRENGTH AND DILATANCY OF SANDS [J].
BOLTON, MD .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 1986, 36 (01) :65-78