Collective Efficacy as a Task Specific Process: Examining the Relationship Between Social Ties, Neighborhood Cohesion and the Capacity to Respond to Violence, Delinquency and Civic Problems
被引:68
作者:
Wickes, Rebecca
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Queensland, Sch Social Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
Univ Queensland, Social Sci Res Inst, Brisbane, Qld 4072, AustraliaUniv Queensland, Sch Social Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
Wickes, Rebecca
[1
,2
]
Hipp, John R.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Criminol Law & Soc, Irvine, CA USA
Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Sociol, Irvine, CA USAUniv Queensland, Sch Social Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
Hipp, John R.
[3
,4
]
Sargeant, Elise
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Queensland, Social Sci Res Inst, Brisbane, Qld 4072, AustraliaUniv Queensland, Sch Social Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
Sargeant, Elise
[2
]
Homel, Ross
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Griffith Univ, Key Ctr Eth Law & Governance, Brisbane, Qld 4111, AustraliaUniv Queensland, Sch Social Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
Homel, Ross
[5
]
机构:
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Social Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Social Sci Res Inst, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Criminol Law & Soc, Irvine, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Sociol, Irvine, CA USA
[5] Griffith Univ, Key Ctr Eth Law & Governance, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia
Collective efficacy;
Social ties;
Social cohesion;
Community;
SELF-EFFICACY;
SPATIAL DYNAMICS;
PERFORMANCE;
COMMUNITY;
TEAM;
MULTILEVEL;
CRIME;
POTENCY;
HEALTH;
SENSE;
D O I:
10.1007/s10464-013-9582-6
中图分类号:
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号:
1004 ;
120402 ;
摘要:
In the neighborhood effects literature, collective efficacy is viewed as the key explanatory process associated with the spatial distribution of a range of social problems. While many studies usefully focus on the consequences of collective efficacy, in this paper we examine the task specificity of collective efficacy and consider the individual and neighborhood factors that influence residents' perceptions of neighborhood collective efficacy for specific tasks. Utilizing survey and administrative data from 4,093 residents nested in 148 communities in Australia, we distinguish collective efficacy for particular threats to social order and assess the relative importance of social cohesion and neighborhood social ties to the development of collective efficacy for violence, delinquency and civic/political issues. Our results indicate that a model separating collective efficacy for specific problems from social ties and the more generalized notions of social cohesion is necessary when understanding the regulation potential of neighborhoods.