Forming and fracture limits of IN718 alloy at elevated temperatures: Experimental and theoretical investigation

被引:42
作者
Mahalle, Gauri [1 ]
Morchhale, Ayush [1 ]
Kotkunde, Nitin [1 ]
Gupta, Amit Kumar [1 ]
Singh, Swadesh Kumar [2 ]
Lin, Y. C. [3 ]
机构
[1] BITS Pilani, Dept Mech Engn, Hyderabad Campus, Hyderabad 500078, Telangana, India
[2] GRIET, Dept Mech Engn, Hyderabad 500072, Telangana, India
[3] Cent South Univ, Sch Mech & Elect Engn, Changsha, Peoples R China
关键词
Inconel; 718; alloy; Limiting strains; Anisotropic yield criteria; Marciniak Kuczynski (M-K) Model; Bao-Wierzbicki (B-W) Model; THIN SHEET; FORMABILITY; BEHAVIOR; DEFORMATION; PREDICTION; STRAIN; LOCUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.04.070
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Forming and fracture forming limit diagrams are significant performance indexes for evaluating the formability of a material. In the present study, experimental and theoretical investigations of the forming and fracture behavior for precipitate-hardenable Inconel 718 superalloy, have been performed at different temperatures (Room temperature (RT) to 700 degrees C). Firstly, uniaxial tests have been conducted over a temperatures range and quasi-static strain rates (10(-4)-10(-1)s(-1)). Flow stress (tensile) has been found to be significantly affected by variation in test temperatures and strain rates. Further, yielding behavior of IN718 alloy has been predicted based on Hill'48 (r and s based) and Barlat'89 criteria. Barlat'89 criterion has better predictability of yielding behavior for IN718 alloy at all test temperatures. Subsequently, experimental forming and fracture limit curves have been plotted at different temperatures using Nakazima test. Limiting true strains have been found to be increasing with test temperature for all deformation regions in forming limit diagrams. Marciniak Kuczynski (M-) and Bao-Wierzbicki (B-W) model coupled with anisotropic yield criteria have been used for theoretical prediction of limiting and failure strains for IN718. The M-K and B-W models coupled with only Barlat'89 criteria have shown a good prediction ability of limiting strains with least root mean square error (RMSE) and average absolute error (AAE).
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 499
页数:18
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2010, Standard Test method for tensile properties of single textile fibers
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2007, SPECIAL METALS INCON, P718
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, ANN BOOK ASTM STANDA, V11, P1, DOI [10.1520/E0517-19, DOI 10.1520/E0517-00R10]
  • [4] Ayres R.A., 1978, J. Appl. Metalwork, V1, P41, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02833958
  • [5] Banabic D., 2010, Comput. Methods in Mater. Sci., V10, P225
  • [6] Banabic D, 2010, SHEET METAL FORMING PROCESSES: CONSTITUTIVE MODELLING AND NUMERICAL SIMULATION, P27, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-88113-1_2
  • [7] Banabic D, 2010, SHEET METAL FORMING PROCESSES: CONSTITUTIVE MODELLING AND NUMERICAL SIMULATION, P213, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-88113-1_4
  • [8] On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality space
    Bao, YB
    Wierzbicki, T
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES, 2004, 46 (01) : 81 - 98
  • [9] Plastic flow for non-monotonic loading conditions of an aluminum alloy sheet sample
    Barlat, F
    Duarte, JMF
    Gracio, JJ
    Lopes, AB
    Rauch, EF
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY, 2003, 19 (08) : 1215 - 1244
  • [10] Formability Assessment of Prestrained Automotive Grade Steel Sheets Using Stress Based and Polar Effective Plastic Strain-Forming Limit Diagram
    Basak, S.
    Panda, S. K.
    Zhou, Y. N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2015, 137 (04):