Nonrandom movement behavior at habitat boundaries in two butterfly species: Implications for dispersal

被引:59
作者
Conradt, L [1 ]
Roper, TJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Sch Life Sci, Brighton, E Sussex, England
关键词
correlated random walks; dispersal trajectories; emigration; habitat edges; habitat fragmentation; movement behavior; navigation; orientation; search strategies; search trajectories;
D O I
10.1890/05-0413
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We observed meadow brown (Maniola jurtina) and gatekeeper (Pyronia tithonus) butterflies at habitat boundaries and observed spontaneous movements out of suitable habitat in order to investigate such movements in relation to dispersal. We found that butterflies of both species were aware of the position of a highly permeable habitat boundary without needing to cross it. Nevertheless, a considerable proportion of butterflies close to the boundary left their habitat (25-43%). Butterflies that crossed the boundary, and moved substantial distances into unsuitable habitat (up to 350 m in M. jurtina and 70 m in P. tithonus), usually returned to their original habitat patch (98-100%). Movement trajectories, at least in M. jurtina, were significantly different from, and more directed and systematic than, a correlated random walk. Approximately 70-80% of spontaneous movements into unsuitable habitat in both species were "foray" loops comparable to those described in mammals and birds. We conclude that, since migrants seemed to have considerable control over leaving their patch and over their subsequent movement trajectories, chance encounter rates with habitat boundaries, and indeed habitat leaving rates, might be less crucial in determining dispersal rates than is usually assumed. In addition, random dispersal trajectories should not be taken for granted in population or evolution models.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 132
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[21]   Dispersal behaviour in fragmented landscapes: Deriving a practical formula for patch accessibility [J].
Heinz, SK ;
Conradt, L ;
Wissel, C ;
Frank, K .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2005, 20 (01) :83-99
[22]   Can the assumption of a non-random search improve our prediction of butterfly fluxes between resource patches? [J].
Kindlmann, P ;
Aviron, S ;
Burel, F ;
Ouin, A .
ECOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2004, 29 (04) :447-456
[23]   Ecological dynamics of extinct species in empty habitat networks.: 1.: The role of habitat pattern and quantity, stochasticity and dispersal [J].
León-Cortés, JL ;
Lennon, JJ ;
Thomas, CD .
OIKOS, 2003, 102 (03) :449-464
[24]   Boundary effects on dispersal between habitat patches by forest birds (Parus major, P-caeruleus) [J].
Matthysen, E .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2002, 17 (06) :509-515
[25]   Butterfly responses to habitat edges in the highly fragmented prairies of Central Iowa [J].
Ries, L ;
Debinski, DM .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2001, 70 (05) :840-852
[26]   Wood thrush postfledging movements and habitat use in northern Virginia [J].
Rivera, JHV ;
Rappole, JH ;
McShea, WJ ;
Haas, CA .
CONDOR, 1998, 100 (01) :69-78
[27]   The process of dispersal in badgers Meles meles [J].
Roper, TJ ;
Ostler, JR ;
Conradt, L .
MAMMAL REVIEW, 2003, 33 (3-4) :314-318
[28]   Movements of cactus bugs: patch transfers, matrix resistance, and edge permeability [J].
Schooley, RL ;
Wiens, JA .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2004, 19 (07) :801-810
[29]  
Schultz CB, 2001, ECOLOGY, V82, P1879, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1879:EMDBIA]2.0.CO
[30]  
2