Weighing as part of your care: a feasibility study exploring the re-introduction of weight measurements during pregnancy as part of routine antenatal care

被引:6
作者
Allen-Walker, V [1 ]
Hunter, A. J. [2 ]
Holmes, V. A. [1 ]
McKinley, M. C. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ Belfast, Royal Victoria Hosp, Ctr Publ Hlth, Sch Med Dent & Biomed Sci,Inst Clin Sci A, Grosvenor Rd, Belfast BT12 6BA, Antrim, North Ireland
[2] Belfast Hlth & Social Care Trust, Royal Jubilee Matern Serv, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[3] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Med Dent & Biomed Sci, UKCRC Ctr Excellence Publ Hlth Northern Ireland, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
Pregnancy; Weight measurement; Routine weighing; Antenatal care; Feasibility; Acceptability; NEONATAL OUTCOMES; WOMEN; OBESITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-020-03011-w
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe UK does not currently have guidelines on gestational weight gain owing to gaps in the evidence base. Reintroducing routine weighing of women throughout pregnancy would begin to provide the evidence needed to fill this gap. The aim of this research was to re-introduce measurement of weight at each routine antenatal appointment in a small scale study, in order to determine the feasibility and acceptability of implementing the practice on a larger scale.MethodsA feasibility study, incorporating quantitative and qualitative components, was conducted in one antenatal hospital clinic and with one community midwifery team. Thirty-eight pregnant women were recruited at their 20week anomaly scan appointment and weighed at their appointments throughout the rest of their pregnancy; five participated in a telephone interview at approximately 37weeks gestation. Data were collected on: numbers consenting to be weighed, reasons for declining to be weighed and number of weight measurements recorded. Qualitative interviews were used to explore acceptability of the practice to pregnant women.ResultsOverall, 79.2% (38 out of 48) of those approached consented to being weighed throughout pregnancy; of the 10 who declined, three cited not wanting to be weighed. In the interviews, women discussed routine weighing as a positive experience, described several benefits of weighing and indicated they would like more information about weight during pregnancy. No major barriers to the integration of a weight measurement into routine antenatal appointments were encountered. Completion of the weight record sheets that were inserted into women's handheld notes varied between staff: of the 26 sheets recovered from handheld notes, only 3 (11.5%) had no weights recorded, 17 (65.4%) had between one and three weights recorded and six (23.1%) had more than 4 weights recorded.ConclusionsIn this feasibility study, routine weighing was acceptable to pregnant women. No barriers that would inhibit re-introduction of weighing women throughout pregnancy into standard antenatal care were encountered. Implementation of routine weighing during pregnancy on a larger scale should be considered as it may have benefits for women in the short and long-term, particularly with regard to informing appropriate gestational weight gain guidelines in the UK.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Routine weighing of women during pregnancyis it time to change current practice? [J].
Allen-Walker, V. ;
Woodside, J. ;
Holmes, V. ;
Young, I. ;
Cupples, M. E. ;
Hunter, A. ;
McKinley, M. C. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 (06) :871-874
[2]   How do women feel about being weighed during pregnancy? A qualitative exploration of the opinions and experiences of postnatal women [J].
Allen-Walker, Virginia ;
Mullaney, Laura ;
Turner, Michael J. ;
Woodside, Jayne V. ;
Holmes, Valerie A. ;
McCartney, Daniel M. A. ;
McKinley, Michelle C. .
MIDWIFERY, 2017, 49 :95-101
[3]   Unconscious collusion: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the maternity care experiences of women with obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m2) [J].
Atkinson, Sandra ;
McNamara, Patricia Mannix .
MIDWIFERY, 2017, 49 :54-64
[4]   How We Design Feasibility Studies [J].
Bowen, Deborah J. ;
Kreuter, Matthew ;
Spring, Bonnie ;
Cofta-Woerpel, Ludmila ;
Linnan, Laura ;
Weiner, Diane ;
Bakken, Suzanne ;
Kaplan, Cecilia Patrick ;
Squiers, Linda ;
Fabrizio, Cecilia ;
Fernandez, Maria .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2009, 36 (05) :452-457
[5]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA.2006, 10.1191/ 1478088706qp063oa 49, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA49]
[6]   Women's opinions on being weighed at routine antenatal visits [J].
Brownfoot, F. C. ;
Davey, M-A ;
Kornman, L. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 (02) :263-270
[7]  
Daley A J, 2015, BMC Obes, V2, P35, DOI 10.1186/s40608-015-0061-5
[8]   REPEATED MEASUREMENT OF MATERNAL WEIGHT DURING PREGNANCY - IS THIS A USEFUL PRACTICE [J].
DAWES, MG ;
GRUDZINSKAS, JG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1991, 98 (02) :189-194
[9]   Midwives perspectives of their training and education requirements in maternal obesity: A qualitative study [J].
Heslehurst, Nicola ;
Russell, Sarah ;
McCormack, Sandra ;
Sedgewick, Gill ;
Bell, Ruth ;
Rankin, Judith .
MIDWIFERY, 2013, 29 (07) :736-744
[10]   Prevention and management of excessive gestational weight gain: a survey of overweight and obese pregnant women [J].
Leslie, W. S. ;
Gibson, A. ;
Hankey, C. R. .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2013, 13