Knowledge integration in science teaching: Analysing teachers' knowledge development

被引:61
作者
Davis, EA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
elementary science teachers; instructional representations; knowledge integration; pedagogical content knowledge; prospective teachers; subject matter knowledge;
D O I
10.1023/B:RISE.0000021034.01508.b8
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper tests the utility of a new sociocognitive frame for analysing the development of teachers' knowledge - the knowledge integration perspective (Linn, Eylon, & Davis, in press; Linn & Hsi, 2000). In doing so, the paper describes one prospective elementary teacher's developing knowledge and highlights its complexity. The prospective teacher demonstrates relatively well-integrated science subject matter knowledge, but she makes some problematic links to lessons and develops some instructional representations that show where she needs to distinguish between different scientific ideas. She also, however, links science concepts to appropriate real-world experiences, indicating that she has nascent useful pedagogical content knowledge. The paper discusses what teacher educators can learn about their learners from this analysis, argues for the utility of the knowledge integration perspective for conducting similar analyses, provides ideas to help science teacher educators apply the perspective easily as they teach their students, and points to areas ripe for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 53
页数:33
相关论文
共 79 条
[61]  
Schneider D, 1994, Bulletin, V89
[62]  
Shulman L. S., 1986, Educational Researcher, V15, P4, DOI [DOI 10.3102/0013189X015002004, 10.2307/1175860]
[63]   THE CONSTRUCTION OF SUBJECT-MATTER KNOWLEDGE IN PRIMARY SCIENCE TEACHING [J].
SMITH, DC ;
NEALE, DC .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 1989, 5 (01) :1-20
[64]  
SMITH MF, 1994, J THERM SPRAY TECHN, V3, P115
[65]   Where does cervical screening stand after the Kent and Canterbury Appeal judgement? [J].
Smith, PA .
CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2000, 11 (01) :1-3
[66]  
Smithey J., 2003, 2 PERSPECTIVES EXPER
[67]  
Stake R.E., 2000, HDB QUALITATIVE RES, P435
[68]  
Stigler J.W., 1999, TEACHING GAP
[69]  
Tobin K., 1994, Handbook of research on science teaching and learning
[70]   In search of explanatory frameworks:: an analysis of Richard!Feynman's lecture 'Atoms in motion' [J].
Treagust, DF ;
Harrison, AG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2000, 22 (11) :1157-1170