The impact of healing time before loading on orthodontic mini-implant stability: A histomorphometric study in minipigs

被引:13
作者
Oltramari-Navarro, Paula V. P. [1 ]
Navarro, Ricardo L. [1 ]
Henriques, Jose Fernando C. [2 ]
Cestari, Tania M. [2 ]
Francischone, Carlos E. [2 ]
Taga, Rumio [2 ]
McNamara, James A., Jr. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Parana, BR-86020030 Londrina, PR, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Sch Dent, Bauru, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Orthodontics; Mini-implant; Healing time; Stability; Minipigs; BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS; ORAL IMPLANTS; ANCHORAGE; BONE; DOG; MINISCREWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.12.010
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate healing time before loading, areas compression and tension and location of insertion on mini-implant stability. Design: Six minipigs were used. Each animal received 3 mini-implants in each quadrant: 1 mini-implant was used as an unloaded control (G1, n = 24); the other 2 were loaded with 150 g-force at three time intervals (G2: immediate loading, G3: after 15 days and G4: after 30 days), with 16 mini-implant in each experimental group. After 120 days, tissue blocks of the areas of interest were harvested. Clinical analysis (exact Fisher test) determined the survival rate. Histological analysis (Kontron KS 300 (TM), Zeiss) quantified the fractional bone-to-implant contact (%BIC) and bone area (%BA) at each healing time point, areas of interest, and insertion site (ANOVA and t tests for dependent and independent samples). Results: The mini-implant survival rates were G1: 71%, G2: 50%, G3: 75% and G4: 63%, with no statistical differences between them. The groups presented similar %BIC and %BA. There were no differences between the compression and tension sides or maxillary and mandibular insertion sites. Conclusions: These results suggest that low-intensity immediate or early orthodontic loading does not affect mini-implant stability, because similar histomorphometric results were observed for all the groups, with partial osseointegration of the mini-implants present. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:806 / 812
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
ADELL R, 1990, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, V5, P347
[2]  
Agresti A., 1992, STAT SCI, V7, P131, DOI [10.1214/ss/1177011454, DOI 10.1214/SS/1177011454]
[3]   OSSEOINTEGRATED ORAL IMPLANTS - A SWEDISH MULTICENTER STUDY OF 8139 CONSECUTIVELY INSERTED NOBELPHARMA IMPLANTS [J].
ALBREKTSSON, T ;
DAHL, E ;
ENBOM, L ;
ENGEVALL, S ;
ENGQUIST, B ;
ERIKSSON, AR ;
FELDMANN, G ;
FREIBERG, N ;
GLANTZ, PO ;
KJELLMAN, O ;
KRISTERSSON, L ;
KVINT, S ;
KONDELL, PA ;
PALMQUIST, J ;
WERNDAHL, L ;
ASTRAND, P .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1988, 59 (05) :287-296
[4]   Long-term evaluation of sandblasted and acid-etched implants used as orthodontic anchors in dogs [J].
Aldikaçti, M ;
Açikgöz, G ;
Türk, T ;
Trisi, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2004, 125 (02) :139-147
[5]   Clinical application and histological examination of the FAMI screw for skeletal anchorage - A pilot study; [Klinischer Einsatz und histologische Bewertung der FAMI-Schraube als kortikaler Anker - Eine Pilotstudie] [J].
Böhm B. ;
Fuhrmann R. .
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 2006, 67 (3) :175-185
[6]  
BRANEMARK P I, 1969, Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, V3, P81
[7]   Load-related implant reaction of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage [J].
Büchter, A ;
Wiechmann, D ;
Koerdt, S ;
Wiesmann, HP ;
Piffko, J ;
Meyer, U .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2005, 16 (04) :473-479
[8]  
Cheng SJ, 2004, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V19, P100
[9]   Miniscrews in orthodontic treatment: Review and analysis of published clinical trials [J].
Crismani, Adriano G. ;
Bertl, Michael H. ;
Celar, Ales G. ;
Bantleon, Hans-Peter ;
Burstone, Charles J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2010, 137 (01) :108-113
[10]  
Fritz Ulrike, 2004, J Orofac Orthop, V65, P410