Once-Daily Extended-Release Versus Twice-Daily Standard-Release Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review

被引:43
|
作者
Ho, Elaine T. L. [1 ,2 ]
Wong, Germaine [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Craig, Jonathan C. [3 ,4 ]
Chapman, Jeremy R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Westmead Hosp, Ctr Transplant & Renal Res, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
[2] Tseung Kwan O Hosp, Dept Med, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Sydney, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[4] Childrens Hosp Westmead, Kids Res Inst, Ctr Kidney Res, Westmead, NSW, Australia
关键词
Biopsy-proven acute rejection; Immunosuppressant; Kidney transplantation; Tacrolimus; Prolonged release; Compliance; Nonadherence; PATIENT NONCOMPLIANCE; PUBLICATION BIAS; GRAFT FUNCTION; SINGLE-CENTER; FORMULATION; PHARMACOKINETICS; CONVERSION; THERAPY; PROGRAF; ADHERENCE;
D O I
10.1097/TP.0b013e318284c15b
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. A simplified dosing regimen may improve drug compliance in kidney transplant recipients and long-term graft outcomes. We aimed to identify, appraise, and synthesize the current evidence comparing the relative safety and efficacy of the recently introduced daily versus standard twice-daily tacrolimus administration. Methods. We systematically reviewed all randomized controlled trials and observational studies that compared the outcomes of daily versus twice-daily tacrolimus formulation in kidney transplant recipients. Medline (from 1948 to July week 4 2011), Embase (1980 to 2011 week 31), the Cochrane Library (1991 to June 2011), and conference proceedings were searched without language restriction. Results. Six randomized controlled trials (n=2499) and 15 observational studies (n=2886) were included in the review. There were no significant differences in biopsy-proven acute rejection (two trials, n=1093; risk ratio [RR; confidence interval (CI)], 1.24 [0.93-1.65]; P=0.15; I-2=0%), patient survival (three trials, n=1156; RR [CI], 0.99 [0.97-1.02]; P=0.55; I-2=32%), and graft survival (three trials, n=1156; RR [CI], 0.99 [0.97-1.02]; P=0.67; I-2=0%) between the two formulations at 12 months. Similar results for acute rejection (five studies, n=391; RR [CI], 0.99 [0.93-1.06]; P=0.84; I-2=0%) and overall patient survival (two studies, n=218; RR [CI], 1.02 [0.94-1.10]; P=0.62; I-2=0%) were observed in observational studies. Conclusions. Once-daily tacrolimus appears to be as effective as twice-daily tacrolimus up to 12 months after kidney transplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:1120 / 1128
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost-effectiveness of once-daily vs twice-daily tacrolimus among Hispanic and Black kidney transplant recipients
    Hurwitz, Jason T.
    Grizzle, Amy J.
    Tyler, Carmelina S.
    Zapata, Lorenzo Villa
    Malone, Daniel C.
    JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2021, 27 (07) : 948 - 960
  • [32] Tacrolimus Exposure Before and After a Switch From Twice-Daily Immediate-Release to Once-Daily Prolonged Release Tacrolimus: The ENVARSWITCH Study
    Monchaud, Caroline
    Woillard, Jean-Baptiste
    Crepin, Sabrina
    Tafzi, Naima
    Micallef, Ludovic
    Rerolle, Jean-Philippe
    Dharancy, Sebastien
    Conti, Filomena
    Choukroun, Gabriel
    Thierry, Antoine
    Buchler, Matthias
    Salame, Ephrem
    Garrouste, Cyril
    Duvoux, Christophe
    Colosio, Charlotte
    Merville, Pierre
    Anglicheau, Dany
    Etienne, Isabelle
    Saliba, Faouzi
    Mariat, Christophe
    Debette-Gratien, Marilyne
    Marquet, Pierre
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 36
  • [33] Effect of Conversion From Twice-daily to Once-daily Tacrolimus on Glucose Intolerance in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients
    Tsuchiya, T.
    Ishida, K.
    Ito, S.
    Deguchi, T.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2012, 44 (01) : 118 - 120
  • [34] Conversion from twice daily tacrolimus capsules to once daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCP-Tacro): Phase 2 trial of stable liver transplant recipients
    Alloway, Rita R.
    Eckhoff, Devin E.
    Washburn, W. Kenneth
    Teperman, Lewis W.
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 20 (05) : 564 - 575
  • [35] A Prospective, Multicenter Study of Once-Daily Extended-Release Tacrolimus in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients
    Charco, R.
    Caralt, M.
    Llado, L.
    Valdivieso, A.
    Fabregat, J.
    Matarranz, A.
    Gonzalez-Pinto, I.
    Pardo, F.
    Fabrega, E.
    Bilbao, I.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2011, 43 (03) : 718 - 723
  • [36] Effects of Converting Tacrolimus Formulation from Twice-Daily to Once-Daily in Liver Transplantation Recipients
    Thorat, Ashok
    Chou, Hong-Shiue
    Lee, Chen-Fang
    Soong, Ruey-Shyang
    Wu, Tsung-Han
    Cheng, Chih-Hsien
    Wu, Ting-Jung
    Chan, Kun-Ming
    Lee, Wei-Chen
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
  • [37] A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study of Conversion from Twice-Daily Immediate-Release to Once-Daily Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus in Liver Transplant Recipients in France: The COBALT Study
    Dumortier, Jerome
    Duvoux, Christophe
    Dubel, Laurence
    Bazin, Fabienne
    Houssel-Debry, Pauline
    ANNALS OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 24 : 506 - 516
  • [38] Early Conversion from Twice-Daily Tacrolimus to Once-Daily Extended Formulation in Renal Transplant Patients Before Hospital Discharge
    Jannot, Martin
    Masson, Ingrid
    Alamartine, Eric
    Mariat, Christophe
    ANNALS OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 19
  • [39] A Bioequivalence Comparison Between the Once-Daily Extended-Release Tablet and the Twice-Daily Tablet Formulations of Deutetrabenazine at Steady State
    Sunzel, Eva-Maria
    Rabinovich-Guilatt, Laura
    Iyengar, Malini
    Ruffo, Debra
    Birajdar, Nagnath G.
    Loupe, Pippa
    Gutierrez, Maria
    Gordon, Mark Forrest
    Ghibellini, Giulia
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 13 (03): : 224 - 232
  • [40] A randomized cross-over comparison of short-term exposure of once-daily extended release tacrolimus and twice-daily tacrolimus on renal function in healthy volunteers
    Zaltzman, Jeffrey S.
    Lai, Vesta
    Schulz, Miklos Z.
    Moon, Kyung-Hee
    Cherney, David Z.
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 27 (12) : 1294 - 1302