The Cochrane Collaboration: institutional analysis of a knowledge commons

被引:4
|
作者
Heywood, Peter [1 ,2 ]
Stephani, Anne Marie [3 ]
Garner, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool Liverpool Sch Trop Med, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Cent Lancashire, Preston, Lancs, England
来源
EVIDENCE & POLICY | 2018年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Cochrane; knowledge commons; institutional analysis; Ostrom; REVIEWS;
D O I
10.1332/174426417X15057479217899
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Cochrane is an international network that produces and updates new knowledge through systematic reviews for the health sector. Knowledge is a shared resource, and can be viewed as a commons. As Cochrane has been in existence for 25 years, we used Elinor Ostrom's theory of the commons and Institutional Analysis and Development Framework to appraise the organisation. Our aim was to provide insight into one particular knowledge commons, and to reflect on how this analysis may help Cochrane and its funders improve their strategy and development. An assessment of Cochrane product showed extensive production of systematic reviews, although assuring consistent quality of these reviews is an enduring challenge; there is some restriction of access to the reviews, open access is not yet implemented; and, while permanence of the record is an emerging problem, it has not yet been widely discussed. The assessment of the process showed that the resource, community, and rules-in-use are complex, vary between different groups within Cochrane, and are not well understood. Many of the rules have been informal, and the underlying ethos of volunteerism where reviews get done are important features and constraints to the organisation. Like all collective efforts, Cochrane is subject to collective action problems, particularly free-riding and variable commitment, and the under-production of public goods and internal processes, such as surveillance of product quality and procedures for transparent resolution of conflicts.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 142
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] How are research data governed at Japanese repositories? A knowledge commons perspective
    Nishikawa, Kai
    ASLIB JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2020, 72 (05) : 837 - 852
  • [32] EMERGENCE OF KNOWLEDGE COMMONS, RISKS, AND RELEVANCE FOR THE HUMAN-RIGHTS FRAMEWORK
    Vila-Vinas, David
    AGE OF HUMAN RIGHTS JOURNAL, 2020, (15): : 186 - 202
  • [33] Markets and knowledge commons: Is there a difference between private and community governance of markets?
    Dekker, Erwin
    Kuchar, Pavel
    PUBLIC CHOICE, 2024, 201 (3-4) : 533 - 553
  • [34] Dissemination of knowledge from Cochrane Public Health reviews: a bibliographic study
    Helmer, Stefanie Maria
    Matthias, Katja
    Mergenthal, Lea
    Reimer, Mia
    De Santis, Karina Karolina
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, 12 (01)
  • [35] Institutional Illogics: The Unconscious and Institutional Analysis
    Vince, Russ
    ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2019, 40 (07) : 953 - 973
  • [36] From meta-analysis to Cochrane reviews
    Ebner, Nicole
    Banach, Maciej
    Anker, Stefan D.
    von Haehling, Stephan
    JOURNAL OF CACHEXIA SARCOPENIA AND MUSCLE, 2018, 9 (03) : 441 - 443
  • [37] Revisiting the learning commons: an analysis of concepts and themes
    Dery, Zipporah M.
    Abrigo, Christine M.
    Torres Jr, Efren M.
    NEW REVIEW OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP, 2025,
  • [38] Toward an Integrated History to Govern the Commons: Using the Archive to Enhance Local Knowledge
    Vazquez, Iago
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE COMMONS, 2020, 14 (01): : 154 - 172
  • [39] Democratisation of Economic Research and Policy by Building a Knowledge Commons: Inspiration from Cooperatives
    Christoforou, Asimina
    Adaman, Fikret
    FORUM FOR SOCIAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 47 (02) : 204 - 213
  • [40] Addressing Knowledge Gaps in ITSM Practice with "Learning Digital Commons": A Case Study
    Ramakrishnan, Muralidharan
    Gregor, Shirley
    Shrestha, Anup
    Soar, Jeffrey
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS FRONTIERS, 2024,