Using Laboratory Experiments in Logistics and Supply Chain Research

被引:30
作者
Deck, Cary [1 ]
Smith, Vernon [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Sam M Walton Coll Business, Behav Business Res Lab, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[2] Chapman Univ, Econ Sci Inst, Orange, CA USA
关键词
laboratory experiments; procurement and replenishment; energy markets; MARKETS; ECONOMICS; AUCTIONS; STAKES; EXPECTATIONS; NETWORKS; BEHAVIOR; AVERSION; REVENUE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1111/jbl.12006
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Laboratory experiments provide an underutilized methodology for subjecting research in logistics and supply chain management to rigorous scientific scrutiny. As discussed in this paper, by following established procedures researchers can create an economic system in which behavior can be observed and replicated. With the ability to control the institution and the environment, researchers have complete information and can exogenously manipulate treatment variables, neither of which may be feasible in field work. We also address many of the reservations that skeptics of laboratory experiments often express including issues of realism, participant sophistication, and payoff stakes. We then provide several examples where experiments have been used to study issues relevant to logistics and supply chain management including auctions, wholesale practices in gasoline markets, inventory replenishment, liberalization of the electric power industry, and deregulation of the natural gas markets. Finally, we identify several additional areas where laboratory experiments could be informative.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 14
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, European Journal of Political Economy
[2]   Large Stakes and Big Mistakes [J].
Ariely, Dan ;
Gneezy, Uri ;
Loewenstein, George ;
Mazar, Nina .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2009, 76 (02) :451-469
[3]  
Backerman S., 2000, Pacific Economic Review, V5, P331
[4]   AGE EFFECTS AND HEURISTICS IN DECISION MAKING [J].
Besedes, Tibor ;
Deck, Cary ;
Sarangi, Sudipta ;
Shor, Mikhael .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2012, 94 (02) :580-595
[5]  
Block M., 1985, ALTERNATIVES RATE RE
[6]  
Blue Ribbon Natural Gas Task Force, 2002, FIN REP RE BARN GEN
[7]   Responses to the Assurance game in monkeys, apes, and humans using equivalent procedures [J].
Brosnan, Sarah F. ;
Parrish, Audrey ;
Beran, Michael J. ;
Flemming, Timothy ;
Heimbauer, Lisa ;
Talbot, Catherine F. ;
Lambeth, Susan P. ;
Schapiro, Steven J. ;
Wilson, Bart J. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2011, 108 (08) :3442-3447
[8]   The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework [J].
Camerer, CF ;
Hogarth, RM .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1999, 19 (1-3) :7-42
[9]   The effect of stakes in distribution experiments [J].
Carpenter, J ;
Verhoogen, E ;
Burks, S .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2005, 86 (03) :393-398
[10]  
Cox J., 1982, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, V1, P537