On the validity of Damkohler's first hypothesis in turbulent Bunsen burner flames: A computational analysis

The validity of Damkohler's first hypothesis, which relates the turbulent flame speed to turbulent flame surface area under the condition where the integral length scale of turbulence is greater than the flame thickness, has been assessed using three-dimensional Direct Numerical Simulations (DNS) of turbulent premixed Bunsen burner flames over a range of values of Reynolds number, pressure and turbulence intensity. It has been found for the Bunsen configuration that the proportionality between volume-integrated burning rate and the overall flame surface area is not strictly maintained according to Damkohler's first hypothesis. The discrepancy is found to originate physically from the local stretch rate dependence of displacement speed, and this helps to explain differences observed previously between flames with and without mean curvature. Approximating the local density-weighted flame propagation speed with the unstrained laminar burning velocity is shown to be inaccurate, and can have a significant influence on the prediction of the overall burning rate for flames with non-zero mean curvature. Using a two-dimensional projection of the actual scalar gradient for flame area evaluation is shown to exacerbate the loss of proportionality between volume-integrated burning rate and the overall flame surface area. The current analysis identifies the conditions under which Damkohler's hypothesis remains valid and the necessary correction for non-zero mean flame curvature. Further, it has been demonstrated that surface-weighted stretch effects on displacement speed need to be accounted for in order to ensure the validity of Damkohler's hypothesis under all circumstances. Finally, it has been found that the volume-integrated density-weighted scalar dissipation rate remains proportional to the overall burning rate for all flames considered here irrespective of the value of Reynolds number, pressure and turbulence intensity. However, this proportionality is lost when the scalar dissipation rate is evaluated using the two-dimensional projection of the actual scalar gradient. (C) 2018 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.