Technology for Early Braille Literacy: Comparison of Traditional Braille Instruction and Instruction with an Electronic Notetaker

被引:13
作者
Bickford, James O. [1 ]
Falco, Ruth A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Dept Special Educ, Grad Sch Educ, Portland, OR 97207 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0145482X1210601012
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Introduction: The study reported here evaluated whether there was a difference in students' outcomes for braille fluency when instruction was provided with traditional braille media or refreshable braille. Students' and teachers' perceptions of the efficacy of the use of the different instructional media were analyzed. Methods: Nine students from public and residential schools, using the Patterns reading series, participated in the study. In an alternating-treatments design, weekly curriculum-based measures that were developed to measure oral reading fluency and word-writing fluency were used to monitor the students' progress with each instructional medium. Semistructured interviews at the conclusion of the study gathered information about the benefits and challenges of each medium. Results: Throughout the 18 weeks of instruction, there were no consistent differences between students' use of the refreshable braille display and their use of paper and the Perkins Brailler. All students achieved gains in their knowledge of braille letters and contractions, and many achieved an increase in fluency, although the increase was not tied to one instructional medium. The participants identified both the advantages and disadvantages of each medium. Discussion: The study did not reveal consistent differences among the students between the outcomes of instruction with the traditional Perkins Brailler and paper or the electronic braille notetaker with a refreshable braille display. The teachers were concerned about the inability of students to obtain spatial relationships using refreshable braille. Implications for practitioners: This study did not provide a clear answer to questions regarding differences in outcomes. The findings suggest that following some instruction with the technology, students can quickly learn to use an electronic braille device, are motivated to use these devices, and may demonstrate enhanced outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 693
页数:15
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Technology and early braille literacy: Using the Mountbatten Pro Brailler in primary-grade classrooms [J].
Cooper, Holly L. ;
Nichols, Sharon K. .
JOURNAL OF VISUAL IMPAIRMENT & BLINDNESS, 2007, 101 (01) :22-31
[2]  
Fuchs LS., 2001, SCI STUD READ, V5, P239, DOI [DOI 10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_3, 10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_3]
[3]   Using curriculum-based measurement to inform reading instruction [J].
Fuchs, Lynn S. ;
Fuchs, Douglas ;
Hamlett, Carol L. .
READING AND WRITING, 2007, 20 (06) :553-567
[4]  
Glaser B. G., 1978, [No title captured]
[5]  
Goodwin A., 1995, MINNESOTA BRAILLE SK
[6]  
Hatlen P., 2000, Foundations of education: History and theory of teaching children and youths with visual impairments, VI, P1
[7]  
Holbrook C. M., 2003, J VISUAL IMPAIRMENT, V97, P646
[8]  
Hosp MK., 2007, ABCS CBM PRACTICAL G
[9]  
Kennedy C.H., 2004, SINGLE CASE DESIGNS, V1st
[10]  
Mangold S. S., 2003, J VISUAL IMPAIRMENT, V97, P256