Can social psychological models be used to promote bicycle helmet use among teenagers?: A comparison of the Health Belief Model, Theory of Planned Behavior and the Locus of Control

被引:158
作者
Lajunen, T [1 ]
Räsänen, M
机构
[1] Middle E Tech Univ, Dept Psychol, ODTU, TR-06531 Ankara, Turkey
[2] VTT Tech Res Ctr Finland, Espoo 02044, Finland
关键词
bicycle helmet; teenagers; theory of planned behavior; health belief model; locus of control;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsr.2003.09.020
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
Problem: The bicycle helmet use rate is still low among teenagers despite the cumulating evidence that bicycle helmets can prevent cyclists from serious injuries and death. The objective of this study was to investigate the usefulness of the Health Belief Model (HBM; Health Education Monographs, 2 (1974) (1), Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB; Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality and behavior. Open University Press, Milton Keynes) and Locus of Control model (LC; Psychological Monographs, (1966) (80) in understanding the intention to use bicycle helmet use among bicycle helmet owners. Method: Data were collected at two schools in Helsinki, Finland. Students (N = 965) completed a questionnaire including three social psychological models applied to helmet use. Models were compared by structural equation modeling techniques. Summary: Results showed that the TPB and LC model fitted the data well, whereas fit of the HBM model was lower than the fit of TPB and LC models. All components of TPB and external LC orientation were significantly related to the intention to use a helmet. TPB together with LC model provide a promising theoretical framework for helmet use promotion campaigns. Practical suggestions for future bicycle helmet campaigns were provided. (C) 2004 National Safety Council and Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 123
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Ajzen I., 2005, Attitudes, personality, and behavior, VSecond
[2]  
[Anonymous], SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY AN
[3]   Bicycle helmet efficacy: a meta-analysis [J].
Attewell, RG ;
Glase, K ;
McFadden, M .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2001, 33 (03) :345-352
[4]   HEALTH BELIEF MODEL AND PREDICTION OF DIETARY COMPLIANCE - FIELD EXPERIMENT [J].
BECKER, MH ;
MAIMAN, LA ;
KIRSCHT, JP ;
HAEFNER, DP ;
DRACHMAN, RH .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, 1977, 18 (04) :348-366
[5]  
Bentler P. M., 2006, EQS 6 structural equations program manual
[6]  
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
[7]   MANDATORY BICYCLE HELMET USE FOLLOWING A DECADE OF HELMET PROMOTION IN VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA - AN EVALUATION [J].
CAMERON, MH ;
VULCAN, AP ;
FINCH, CF ;
NEWSTEAD, SV .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 1994, 26 (03) :325-337
[8]  
Conner M., 1996, PREDICTING HLTH BEHA
[9]   Factors influencing use of bicycle helmets among undergraduate students [J].
Coron, J ;
McLaughlin, G ;
Dorman, SM .
JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH, 1996, 44 (06) :294-297
[10]   Can a combination of local, regional and national information substantially increase bicycle-helmet wearing and reduce injuries? Experiences from Sweden [J].
Ekman, R ;
Schelp, L ;
Welander, G ;
Svanstrom, L .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 1997, 29 (03) :321-328