A mathematical model to evaluate different train loading and stacking policies in a container terminal

被引:25
作者
Ambrosino, Daniela [1 ]
Caballini, Claudia [2 ]
Siri, Silvia [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Genoa, Dept Econ & Business Studies, Genoa, Italy
[2] Univ Genoa, Dept Informat Bioengn Robot & Syst Engn, Genoa, Italy
关键词
maritime container terminals; rail import cycle; train load planning; stacking policies evaluation; train load policies evaluation; optimization; YARD STORAGE STRATEGY; OPERATIONS-RESEARCH; IMPORT CONTAINERS;
D O I
10.1057/mel.2013.7
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
A container terminal is devoted to transfer containers from sea to land and vice versa in the most efficient way. The main objective of a container terminal is to optimize, in terms of times and costs, the activities related to container handling and forwarding. As regards the hinterland side, a crucial activity is represented by train loading/unloading, considering also the increasing importance assumed by rail transportation in allowing the move of large volumes of goods in/out of the logistic transportation nodes. This article pursues the modelling and comparison of different train loading policies by varying the storage area strategies in order to evaluate them and determine the most effective policy for ensuring quickness and efficiency in the terminal. With respect to the train loading policies, all the possible configurations are taken into account, starting from a pure sequential loading by the rail overhead travelling crane, which consequently implies some rehandling operations in the yard, up to the opposite situation in which non-sequential loading operations are allowed in order to avoid rehandling activities. These loading policies are analysed by varying the stacking strategies adopted in the yard where containers can be stored taking into consideration different factors (commercial priorities, weights, and so on). By using real data in relation to the physical characteristics of containers, trains and wagons, a proper experimental campaign has been performed in order to test the effectiveness of the different scenarios described above.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 308
页数:17
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Ambrosino D., 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering, P208, DOI 10.1109/CASE.2011.6042439
  • [2] Ambrosino D., 2003, Maritime Economics & Logistics, V5, P285
  • [3] Optimized load planning of trains in intermodal transportation
    Bruns, Florian
    Knust, Sigrid
    [J]. OR SPECTRUM, 2012, 34 (03) : 511 - 533
  • [4] Chen T., 1999, MARITIME POLICY 38 M, V26, P27
  • [5] HANDLING STRATEGIES FOR IMPORT CONTAINERS AT MARINE TERMINALS
    DECASTILHO, B
    DAGANZO, CF
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1993, 27 (02) : 151 - 166
  • [6] Advanced methods for container stacking
    Dekker, Rommert
    Voogd, Patrick
    van Asperen, Eelco
    [J]. OR SPECTRUM, 2006, 28 (04) : 563 - 586
  • [7] A yard storage strategy for minimizing traffic congestion in a marine container transshipment hub
    Han, Yongbin
    Lee, Loo Hay
    Chew, Ek Peng
    Tan, Kok Choon
    [J]. OR SPECTRUM, 2008, 30 (04) : 697 - 720
  • [8] A container yard storage strategy for improving land utilization and operation efficiency in a transshipment hub port
    Jiang, Xinjia
    Lee, Loo Hay
    Chew, Ek Peng
    Han, Yongbin
    Tan, Kok Choon
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 221 (01) : 64 - 73
  • [9] A note on a dynamic space-allocation method for outbound containers
    Kim, KH
    Park, KT
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2003, 148 (01) : 92 - 101
  • [10] Kim KH, 1997, COMPUT IND ENG, V32, P701, DOI 10.1016/S0360-8352(97)00024-7