Recognition Thresholds for Static and Dynamic Emotional Faces

被引:75
作者
Calvo, Manuel G. [1 ]
Avero, Pedro [1 ]
Fernandez-Martin, Andres [2 ]
Recio, Guillermo [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ La Laguna, Dept Cognit Psychol, Tenerife 38205, Spain
[2] Univ Int La Rioja, Dept Behav Sci, Logrono, Spain
[3] Univ Hamburg, Dept Differential Psychol & Psychol Assessment, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
facial expression; dynamic; emotion; recognition thresholds; intensity; FACIAL EXPRESSION RECOGNITION; INTENSITY; IDENTITY; REPRESENTATIONS; PERCEPTION; ACCURACY; TIME;
D O I
10.1037/emo0000192
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We investigated the minimum expressive intensity that is required to recognize (above chance) static and dynamic facial expressions of happiness, sadness, anger, disgust, fear, and surprise. To this end, we varied the degree of intensity of emotional expressions unfolding from a neutral face, by means of graphics morphing software. The resulting face stimuli (photographs and short videos) were presented in an expression categorization task for 1 s each, and measures of sensitivity or discrimination (A') were collected to establish thresholds. A number of physical, perceptual, categorical, and affective controls were performed. All six basic emotions were reliably recognized above chance level from low intensities, although recognition thresholds varied for different expressions: 20% of intensity, for happiness; 40%, for sadness, surprise, anger, and disgust; and 50%, for fear. The advantage of happy faces may be due to their greater physical change in facial features (as shown by automated facial expression measurement), also at low levels of intensity, relative to neutral faces. Recognition thresholds and the pattern of confusions across expressions were, nevertheless, equivalent for dynamic and static expressions, although dynamic expressions were recognized more accurately and faster.
引用
收藏
页码:1186 / 1200
页数:15
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Deciphering the enigmatic face - The importance of facial dynamics in interpreting subtle facial expressions [J].
Ambadar, Z ;
Schooler, JW ;
Cohn, JF .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (05) :403-410
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Manual and Investigators Guide
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Technical Report A-6
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1976, Pictures of facial affect
[5]   Converging Evidence for the Advantage of Dynamic Facial Expressions [J].
Arsalidou, Marie ;
Morris, Drew ;
Taylor, Margot J. .
BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2011, 24 (02) :149-163
[6]  
Bartlett M., 2011, The Oxford Handbook of Face Perception, P489
[7]   Emotional Facial Expression Detection in the Peripheral Visual Field [J].
Bayle, Dimitri J. ;
Schoendorff, Benjamin ;
Henaff, Marie-Anne ;
Krolak-Salmon, Pierre .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (06)
[8]   The Vividness of the Happy Face [J].
Becker, D. Vaughn ;
Srinivasan, Narayanan .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 23 (03) :189-194
[9]   Emotion recognition: The role of featural and configural face information [J].
Bombari, Dario ;
Schmid, Petra C. ;
Mast, Marianne Schmid ;
Birri, Sandra ;
Mast, Fred W. ;
Lobmaier, Janek S. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 66 (12) :2426-2442
[10]   Role of motion signals in recognizing subtle facial expressions of emotion [J].
Bould, Emma ;
Morris, Neil .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 99 :167-189