Cementless Versus Cemented Tibial Fixation in Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Replacement A Randomized Trial

被引:19
|
作者
Nivbrant, Nils Oscar [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Khan, Riaz J. K. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Fick, Daniel P. [3 ,4 ]
Haebich, Samantha [3 ]
Smith, Ewan [3 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Dept Surg & Perioperat Sci, Orthopaed, Umea, Sweden
[2] Fiona Stanley Hosp, Murdoch, WA, Australia
[3] Hollywood Med Ctr, Joint Studio, Perth, WA, Australia
[4] Hollywood Private Hosp, Nedlands, WA, Australia
[5] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Med, Fremantle, WA, Australia
关键词
EARLY MIGRATION; FOLLOW-UP; ARTHROPLASTY; RSA; COMPONENTS; PROSTHESES; REVISION; DENSITY; HIP;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.19.01010
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Evidence supports the use of cementless tibial component fixation in total knee replacement but there is a paucity of literature on posterior stabilized designs. This randomized study of posterior stabilized total knee replacements compared cemented and cementless tibial fixation with regard to component migration, bone remodeling, and clinical outcomes. Methods: This prospective single-center, blinded, randomized clinical trial included 100 patients with a mean age of 68 years (range, 45 to 87 years). Operations were performed by either of 2 experienced arthroplasty surgeons using the Advanced Coated System (ACS) prosthesis (Implantcast). Patients were randomized to cemented or cementless tibial fixation; other variables were standardized. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) and dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were performed during the inpatient stay and at 3, 12, and 24 months to monitor tibial component migration and periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD). Clinical scores including the Oxford Knee Score and Short Form-12 were assessed prior to surgery and during follow-up. Results: Late and continuing migration was found with cementless fixation. At 24 months, the mean subsidence was significantly greater for the cementless group (1.22 mm) compared with the cemented group (0.06 mm) (p < 0.01). The mean maximum total point motion at 24 months was 2.04 mm for the cementless group and 0.48 mm for the cemented group (p < 0.01). The cemented group had more BMD loss than the cementless group in the medial, lateral, and anterior periprosthetic regions. Two tibial components were revised in the cementless group, including 1 for loosening. Clinical scores improved equally in the 2 groups. Conclusions: Late ongoing subsidence and high maximum total point motion in our patients who underwent cementless tibial fixation raise concerns about the fixation stability of ACS cementless posterior stabilized knee replacements. Cemented tibial components were stable. Thus, we advise caution regarding the use of cementless tibial components and recommend tibial fixation with cement for the ACS posterior stabilized total knee replacement.
引用
收藏
页码:1075 / 1082
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cementless vs Cemented Tibial Fixation in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Behery, Omar A.
    Kearns, Sean M.
    Rabinowitz, Justin M.
    Levine, Brett R.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (05) : 1510 - 1515
  • [2] Cemented Versus Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty of the Same Modern Design A Prospective, Randomized Trial
    Nam, Denis
    Lawrie, Charles M.
    Salih, Rondek
    Nahhas, Cindy R.
    Barrack, Robert L.
    Nunley, Ryan M.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2019, 101 (13) : 1185 - 1192
  • [3] Cementless total knee replacement fixation
    Kwong, L. M.
    Nielsen, E. S.
    Ruiz, D. R.
    Hsu, A. H.
    Dines, M. D.
    Mellano, C. M.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2014, 96B : 87 - 92
  • [4] Cemented Versus Cementless Fixation of a Tibial Component in LCS Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed by a Single Surgeon
    Choy, Won-Sik
    Yang, Dae-Suk
    Lee, Kwang-Won
    Lee, Sang-Ki
    Kim, Kap-Jung
    Chang, Shann-Haw
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (12) : 2397 - 2401
  • [5] The cost analysis of cemented versus cementless total hip replacement operations on the NHS
    Kallala, R.
    Anderson, P.
    Morris, S.
    Haddad, F. S.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2013, 95B (07) : 874 - 876
  • [6] Randomized controlled trial comparing traditional versus enhanced-fixation designs of a novel cemented total knee arthroplasty tibial component
    Turgeon, T. R.
    Vasarhelyi, E.
    Howard, J.
    Teeter, M.
    Righolt, C. H.
    Gascoyne, T.
    Bohm, E.
    BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2024, 5 (01): : 20 - 27
  • [7] Contact Stress at the Anterior Aspect of the Tibial Post in Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Replacement
    Hamai, Satoshi
    Miura, Hiromasa
    Matsuda, Shuichi
    Shimoto, Takeshi
    Higaki, Hidehiko
    Iwamoto, Yukihide
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2010, 92A (08) : 1765 - 1773
  • [8] Cemented versus Cementless Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Driesman, Adam S.
    Macaulay, William
    Schwarzkopf, Ran
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (08) : 704 - 709
  • [9] Cementless versus Cemented Fixation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Usage, Costs, and Complications during the Inpatient Period
    Gwam, Chukwuweike U.
    George, Nicole E.
    Etcheson, Jennifer, I
    Rosas, Samuel
    Plate, Johannes F.
    Delanois, Ronald E.
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (11) : 1081 - 1087
  • [10] Cemented vs. Cementless Fixation in Primary Knee Replacement: A Narrative Review
    Wilczynski, Mikolaj
    Bieniek, Michal
    Krakowski, Przemyslaw
    Karpinski, Robert
    MATERIALS, 2024, 17 (05)