Communicating science in organizational contexts: toward an "organizational turn" in science communication research

被引:31
作者
Schafer, Mike S. [1 ]
Faehnrich, Birte [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, IKMZ Dept Commun & Media Res, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Berlin Brandenburg Acad Sci & Humanities, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Meta-Analysis; Science communication; Strategic communication; Organizational communication; PUBLIC-RELATIONS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SOCIAL MEDIA; UNIVERSITIES USE; RISK; REPRESENTATIONS; METAANALYSIS; SCIENTISTS; JOURNALISM; COVERAGE;
D O I
10.1108/JCOM-04-2020-0034
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Purpose - Research on science communication in organizational contexts is scarce - even though many cases can be found where organizations from science and beyond communicate about science-related issues, or where organizational contexts have an impact on the communication of individual scientists and scientific organizations. Therefore, it is time for an "organizational turn" in science communication research, and for more scholarly emphasis on the specific cases that science-related communication in, from and about organizations presents. Such an approximation would benefit both science communication research and analyses of strategic and organizational communication. Design/methodology/approach - This special issue of the "Journal of Communication Management" on "Communicating Science in Organizational Contexts" is a step in this direction: It compiles commentaries from leading scholars in the respective fields as well as research articles coming from various disciplines and conceptual as well as methodological paradigms. In the editorial, we assess overlaps between scholarship on science communication and strategic communication, respectively, based on a meta-analysis of journals in the field(s), develop a guiding heuristic for analyzing science communication in organizational settings, and introduce the contributions to the special issue. Findings - The meta-analysis shows that overlaps between science communication research and scholarship on strategic communication are scarce. While organizations and their communication appear occasionally, and increasingly often, in science communication research, scholars of strategic communication only rarely analyze science communication. Research limitations/implications - The meta-analysis is limited to the publications of five scholarly journals over ten years. It still demonstrates the lack of research in the intersection of scholarship on science communication and strategic communication. Practical implications - Scientific organizations are rapidly extending and professionalizing their strategic communication, and an increasing number of organizations beyond science communicate on science or science-related issues. Understanding science communication in organizational settings, therefore, is crucial for practitioners in both areas. Originality/value - Analyzing science communication in organizational settings is of increasing importance - yet few studies exist that have done it, and the respective research fields devote not much attention to one another. The special issue is a first foray into this new, intersectional field.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 154
页数:18
相关论文
共 100 条
  • [1] Akin H., 2017, OXFORD HDB SCI SCI C, P25, DOI [10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.01.005, 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190497620.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190497620.001.0001]
  • [2] Science reporting in Accra, Ghana: Sources, barriers and motivational factors
    Appiah, Bernard
    Gastel, Barbara
    Burdine, James N.
    Russell, Leon H.
    [J]. PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2015, 24 (01) : 23 - 37
  • [3] Bauer M. W., 2017, Forschungsfeld Wissenschaftskommunikation, P17, DOI [10.1007/978-3-658-12898-22, DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-12898-22]
  • [4] Bauer M W., 2013, Global Science Journalism Report: Working Conditions Practices, Professional Ethos and Future Expectations
  • [5] Bauer MW, 2007, ROUTLEDGE STUD SCI T, P33
  • [6] How Canadian universities use social media to brand themselves
    Bélanger C.H.
    Bali S.
    Longden B.
    [J]. Tertiary Education and Management, 2014, 20 (1) : 14 - 29
  • [7] Bonfadelli H., 2017, Das Forschungsfeld Wissenschaftskommunikation
  • [8] Bonfadelli H., 2017, The Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication, P157, DOI 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190497620.013.17
  • [9] Borchelt RE, 2014, ROUT INT HANDB, P58
  • [10] Knowledge, Legitimation and the Politics of Risk: The Functions of Research in Public Debates on Migration
    Boswell, Christina
    [J]. POLITICAL STUDIES, 2009, 57 (01) : 165 - 186