Client Risk Management: A Pecking Order Analysis of Auditor Response to Upward Earnings Management Risk

被引:55
作者
Krishnan, Gopal V. [1 ]
Sun, Lili [2 ]
Wang, Qian [3 ]
Yang, Rong [4 ]
机构
[1] American Univ, Washington, DC 20016 USA
[2] Univ N Texas, Denton, TX 76203 USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[4] Rochester Inst Technol, Rochester, NY USA
来源
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY | 2013年 / 32卷 / 02期
关键词
earnings management; discretionary accruals; audit fees; auditor resignations; client risk management; INTERNAL CONTROL; LITIGATION RISK; FINANCIAL EXPERTISE; NONAUDIT SERVICES; ACCRUALS QUALITY; COMMITTEE; BOARD; INDEPENDENCE; ASSOCIATION; FEES;
D O I
10.2308/ajpt-50372
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study examines Big N auditors' client risk management strategy in response to the risk of upward (i.e., income-increasing) earnings management in the post-SOX era. Specifically, we empirically study the relation between clients' signed discretionary accruals and subsequent audit pricing and auditor resignation decisions. We find that audit fees and resignations are positively associated with the risk of upward earnings management. We document a pecking order of auditor responses and find that auditors are more likely to respond in the order of charging higher abnormal audit fees if the trade-off between upward earnings management risk and return is within an acceptable level, and then resign if the risk is more severe and exceeds the auditors' tolerance level. Our results are robust to alternative accruals measures, controlling for clients' internal control quality and corporate governance characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 169
页数:23
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Earnings management, litigation risk, and asymmetric audit fee responses [J].
Abbott, Lawrence J. ;
Parker, Susan ;
Peters, Gary F. .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2006, 25 (01) :85-98
[2]   Audit committee characteristics and restatements [J].
Abbott, LJ ;
Parker, S ;
Peters, GF .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2004, 23 (01) :69-87
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, COMMUNICATION
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.JACCPUBPOL.2007.03.001, DOI 10.1016/J.JACCPUBP0L.2007.03.001]
[5]   Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence [J].
Ashbaugh, H ;
LaFond, R ;
Mayhew, BW .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2003, 78 (03) :611-639
[6]   The balance sheet as an earnings management constraint [J].
Barton, J ;
Simko, PJ .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2002, 77 :1-27
[7]  
Beasley MS, 1996, ACCOUNT REV, V71, P443
[8]   The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management [J].
Bedard, Jean ;
Chtourou, Sonda Marrakchi ;
Courteau, Lucie .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2004, 23 (02) :13-35
[9]  
Beneish M., 1997, J ACCOUNT PUBLIC POL, V16, P271, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0278-4254(97)00023-9
[10]   Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses [J].
Burgstahler, D ;
Dichev, I .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1997, 24 (01) :99-126